• Home Contact Us What's New New Litters Puppy ExportsAbout Us Pom Reader Kennel Visit Poms in Canada Kennel Visit  • About Poms Stud Services Links Photo Album • 

   • Fun Photos New Damascusroad ChampionshipsPuppies Growing Up List of ArticlesAbout Pet FoodSkin/Coat Care Vaccination Information CKC Breed Standard • 



Vaccination: The UnGodly Practice
By Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H.; Pastor Norm Franz and Errol Owen

Many people believe that vaccinations are safe and 'mandatory' for school and/or workplace attendance. They are clearly deceived in most cases. Vaccines are not 'mandatory' in most American states that allow for personal, religious, and/or medical exemptions. Furthermore, the practice of vaccination is far from safe. In fact, if you were to seriously consider the suppressed facts you would likely conclude that the alleged benefits of vaccination do not outweigh the severe and extensive risks.

For parents who elect to forego these risks, in celebration to God and His blessings, among which are health and natural immunity, the following pages include Bible verses that should be copied and then attached to your vaccination waiver or declination form(s). 

The following Bible excerpts serve as a supplement to the ninety-minute audiotape entitled, Horowitz 'On Vaccines.' This tape provides a lengthy discussion on a citizen's right to refuse vaccination for spiritual and religious reasons. Ways to avoid vaccinations and assertively respond to coercive vaccine proponents and shot administrators are discussed. Moreover, the tape presents stunning admissions by vaccine industry experts, including 1998 Sabin Gold Medal of Honor awardee Dr. Maurice Hilleman, and others who admit to the contaminated and deadly nature of many of our most trusted vaccines.

Biblical support for those who wish to avoid vaccinations for spiritual and religious reasons include the following law prohibiting genetic engineering or the use of its products:

Leviticus:19:19 Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen [plant] and woolen [animal] come upon thee.

Relevant reasons for God's warning in this regard includes the fact that bovine (cow) fetal serum is commonly used in the manufacturing process of vaccines. So are monkey kidney cells, chicken embryo parts, bacterial or viral genetic materials - RNA and DNA, as well as yeast and human proteins. Using the example of cows, bovine fetal serum is mixed with bacteria or viral particles, and other vaccine ingredients including toxic metals, such as mercury and aluminum, and immune destructive chemicals. Thus, proteins and genetic materials from the cattle, viruses, and bacteria are mixed before these particles are injected into you or your children. Once the vaccine ingredients, including foreign RNA and DNA, and genetically engineered bacteria and/or viruses, or their parts, enter your blood, they may cause genetic mutations of your cells. Then you have sown thy bloodstream 'with mingled seed' that not only taxes your immune system further, but may cause the development of cancer cells as well. These may go on to become full blown cancers, particularly in the presence of a weakened immune system made weak by vaccine 'adjuvents.'

Likewise, this cross species transfer of infectious particles often initiates autoimmune diseases, as discussed earlier in this book. These are major reasons why vaccination is an 'ungodly practice.'

Your blood contains vital white blood cell body guards (i.e., lymphocytes) that provide for surveillance and destructive responses against cancer cells and malignant tumors. Therefore, overly taxing these cells, as vaccinations often do, is unclean and unhealthy. Elsewhere in the Bible, God recommends that you maintain your blood clean and healthy. A few of these verses are provided below.

Integrating this knowledge further, some vaccines are made from 'pooling' human blood taken from people, including social drop-outs and drug addicts, who were exposed to various infectious agents (e.g., bacteria, and viruses). Once vaccine makers have these people's blood, their laboratory technicians separate their serum from the whole cells, and then this serum is used to make the final vaccines. 

This was the case with the hepatitis B vaccine that was given to gay men in New York City and Blacks in Central Africa in 1974. This vaccine, according to all the suppressed scientific evidence, as well as testimonies from insiders, most likely, initiated the international AIDS pandemic. 

In essence, the routine vaccine practice of sacrificing animals to grow infectious cancer viruses is obviously risky. This was the case for the cancer and AIDS linked polio and hepatitis B vaccines. Merck vaccine makers took dead or dying animal's tissues, including their blood, in an effort to extract these infectious agents. Then they mixed these animal incubated contaminants with human blood. This blood ultimately got mixed to make the final vaccine. In this manner, cross-species transmission of infectious agents most easily and commonly occurred as it does today. According to the Bible, this is a sin.

There are several Bible referenc

Following WWII, most of Hitler's top biological weapons developers were secretly sent to work for the allies. Several infamous medical experimenters came to America under the covert operation called 'Paperclip' administered by the OSS and later the CIA. Among the Nazi transplants was Erich Traub and his assistant. This world class cancer virologist, Hitler's top biological weapons expert, was assigned to the U.S. Navy Biological Research Laboratory affiliated with the University of California . He was paid more than $65,000 of U.S. taxpayer money (plus benefits!) to continue his nefarious genocidal weapons experiments for many years during the cold war.

es to the importance of maintaining clean blood. A few of these are listed below. It should be recalled that, as I detailed in the book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola- Nature, Accident or Intentional?, the Rockefeller family largely established and controls the international blood banking industry. Laurance Rockefeller, in particular, assembled the New York City Blood Council- the council of doctors that established the New York City Blood Bank. This was the organization that allowed 10,000 hemophiliacs throughout the United States , and countless others around the world, to receive the AIDS virus (HIV) through their contaminated blood supplies. They knew, in advance, that the blood was infected with these viruses and others. More recently, the Canadian and American publics learned that hepatitis C contaminated blood, another cancer trigger, and protein 'prions'- the 'mad-cow' Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease agent, also flowed from these blood 'bankster' labs to millions more.

It is well known that the Rockefeller family also established a virtual monopoly over the American medical and pharmaceutical industries as early as the 1920s. This was the same decade they heavily funded and directed the fledgling cancer industry as well as the eugenics movement. 

The Rockefeller led eugenics effort began the study of human genetics. DNA differences between the races began to be mapped by their research foundations and organizations long before Hitler's Third Reich got involved in what later eugenicists called 'racial hygiene.' Rockefeller funded research focused on the genetic predispositions for cancer and other diseases between various races of people. In 1928, the Rockefeller family fortune then built the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity in pre-Nazi Germany . This institute gave rise to the majority of Hitler's top racial hygienists, including Ernst Rudin. Rudin later directed Hitler's 'Racial Hygiene Society.'

Stunningly, previously secret documents show the Rockefeller family was heavily invested in a partnership with Hitler's Third Reich. Germany 's leading industrial organization during World War II was IG Farben. Top Farben directors were among Hitler's highest ranking SS officers. With the help of the Dulles brothers, and their Wall Street law firm- Sullivan and Cromwell- John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company secured the patent rights over the synthetic oil and rubber the holocaust victims were about to produce in the factories they built adjacent Auschwitz and elsewhere. 

It should also be known that IG Farben, Rockefeller's intimate partner, held the patent on the gas that killed the millions of holocaust victims as they entered the 'showers,' allegedly for 'public health' and 'disinfection.'

The book and tape cited above also details the development of the 1974 experimental hepatitis B vaccine that most likely transmitted HIV to New York City 's gay men and Blacks in Central Africa . This vaccine was developed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The project was directed by Dr. Maurice Hilleman, vaccine chief at the Merck pharmaceutical company. Astonishingly, this company received a major share of the Nazi war chest near the close of WWII. At that time, the company's president, George W. Merck, was America 's biological weapons industry director. He had been personally appointed by President Roosevelt and Secretary of War Stimson.

Another fact worthy of considering is that today the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Merck Fund, whose parent companies were previous partners with Hitler, are leading funding sources for world 'depopulation.' A gift wrapped form of genocide, and a continuation of their early eugenics efforts, today their work is positively heralded and allegedly needed for 'population control.' These associations, their related histories, and ties to contemporary vaccine agendas, are deserving of investigations by governments around the world.

Following a storm of criticism by many Third World nations during and after international 'population control' conferences, several U.S. Government officials decided to phase out institutionalized reference to 'population control.' Newly chosen surrogates included the phrases, 'Family Planning,' and 'Maternal and Child Health.'

Could this be the real reason why 'Family Planning' centers, and 'Material and Child Health' clinics, allegedly 'require vaccinations,' and promote their use so ardently? 

Given this alarming background, the following Bible passages have special relevance: 

Lamentations 4.13-15 foreshadows the AIDS pandemic, and other current and coming plagues. It also relays the fear and avoidance surrounding HIV-positive and other infected, sick, and dying people. As you read the first paragraph, consider the fact that religious leaders are encouraging their followers to get vaccinated. Many are even inviting 'public health' nurses and vaccine administrators into their congregations to deliver the toxic, and too often lethal, doses:

"It happened because of the sins of her prophets and the offenses of her priests (and rabbis), who, within her walls, shed the blood of the righteous. They wander in the streets like the blind; they are so polluted with blood that nobody is able even to touch their clothing. Keep away! Unclean!' people shout at them, 'Keep away! Away, don't touch us!' They flee, to wander here and there; but no nation allows them to stay."

Ezekiel 3:18-20 provides a pretty good argument why it's important to relay these facts concerning vaccines, blood transfusions, sin, and death:

"When I say to a wicked man, 'You will surely die,' and you do not warn him or speak out to dissuade him from his evil ways in order to save his life, that wicked man will die for his sin, and I will hold you accountable for his blood. But if you do warn the wicked man and he does not turn from his wickedness or from his evil ways, he will die for his sin; but you will be saved yourself."

Ezekiel 5.17 provides another blood-related warning and prophecy that may relate to recent outbreaks, particularly the hemorrhagic fever virus Ebola. As documented in the book "Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola- Nature, Accident or Intentional?," this virus was apparently produced by Litton Bionetics - America 's sixth leading biological weapons contracting laboratory:

"Yes, I will send famine and savage beasts upon you to leave you without children; plague and bloodshed will sweep through you; and I will bring the sword upon you. I, God, have spoken it."

Luke 13.1-5 states that those who mix human blood with the blood of sacrificed animals are 'sinners.' This is precisely what pharmaceutical industrialists do to many vaccines.

"There were present at that season some that told him of the Galileans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And Jesus answering said unto them. Suppose ye that these Galileans were sinners above all the Galileans, because they suffered such things?" 

Finally, Revelation provides an 'End Times' prophecy in which the Kings, merchants, and wealthiest men of all the nations were deceived by 'magic spells' or 'sorcery.' Biblical references to the practice of 'magic spells' or 'sorcery' comes from the Greek root word of 'sorcery,' that is, pharmacopeia meaning pharmacy. This 'sorcery,' is not only associated in the Bible with spilled and impure blood, but with the great plagues, and onslought of deadly 'beasts.' 

Strong's Concordance Root word for 'beasts' is the 'Hebrew word #2416- chay- alive, raw flesh . . . appetite; in the Greek Lexicon, the Greek word #2342 for 'beasts' is 'therion'- 'a little beast, little animal.' Thus, the earth's  greatest depopulation event is predicted to be associated with little beasts and the great plagues. Could these 'little beasts' be bacteria, viruses, and pieces thereof- infectious microorganisms most insidiously spread throughout the world, most precisely and extensively, in contaminated blood and vaccines? That's exactly what many experts say is occurring today.

Those who 'fornicated' with the devil, and stole 'the blood of prophets and of God's people,' would surely be severely judged by God in the last days. (See Revelation 18:23-19:2.) The Bible predicts that around the time ' Babylon the great' falls, its deadly wine, also symbolic of blood, will flow out full of impurities into the 'rivers and streams' that the Bible says are the earth's 'people.' They will likely then be infected with agents- little 'beasts'- associated with great plagues that will wipe out more than a third of the world's population.

Indeed, a reasonable interpretation of these sections of Revelation include the suggestion that vaccine/pharmaceutical/blood industrialists, all largely directed by the Rockefeller family, and their friends, have deceived international leaders, merchants, and the wealthy. 

Finally, in Revelation, God's judgment and great wrath comes upon those who have worshiped these Babylonian idols above the Lord. Today, as modern medical science is idolized, and continues to dramatically alter the gene pools of plants, animals, microorganisms, and humans, Babylonian scientists are destroying the perfection that God created over all the earth.

Additional Bible verses of interest on these topics include:

Ezekiel 14.19: Or if I [Lord God] send a pestilence into that land, and pour out my fury upon it in blood, to cut off from it man and beast.

Ezekiel 16.6: And when I passed by thee, and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live; yea, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live.

Revelation 14:19-20 And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God. . . . and blood flowed from the winepress.

Revelation 18.4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Revelation 19.1-2 . . . the Lord our God . . . hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth . . . and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.

The End.

For more information regarding any of the books or tapes mentioned above, please contact:

Tetrahedron, LLC
P. O. Box 2033
Sandpoint, ID 83864
FAX: 208-265-2775
e-mail: tetra@tetrahedron.org
or visit our website catalog at:

Moreover, the above website contains many free downloadable files concerning vaccines, cancer, new autoimmune diseases, and the coming plagues. 
These free articles are accessible through the 'News' and 'Articles' page of Tetrahedron, LLC's website. 


An introduction to the contradictions between medical science and immunization policy.
c by Alan Phillips (aphillip@email.unc.edu). Last Revision: February 1997.

 See the Informed Parents Vaccination Home Page" on the World Wide Web at URL: http://www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/imformed.htm

 *Permission freely granted to copy and redistribute in full for any nonprofit purpose. Persons concerned with for-profit distribution, electronic postings, and other concerns should contact the author at Vaccine Awareness, P.O. Box 62282 , Durham , NC 27715 or by email (see above).  



Is there a legitimate controversy?

When my son began his routine vaccination series at age 2 months, I did not know there were any risks associated with immunizations. But the clinic's literature contained a contradiction: the chances of a serious adverse reaction to the DPT vaccine were 1 in 1750, while his chances of dying from pertussis each year were 1 in several million. When I pointed this out to the physician, he angrily disagreed, and stormed out of the room mumbling, "I guess I should read that sometime..." Soon thereafter I learned of a child who had been permanently disabled by a vaccine, so I decided to investigate for myself. My findings have so alarmed me that I feel compelled to share them; hence, this report.

Health authorities credit vaccines for disease declines, and assure us of their safety and effectiveness. Yet these seemingly rock-solid assumptions are directly contradicted by health statistics, medical studies, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports, and reputable research scientists from around the world. In fact, infectious diseases declined steadily for decades prior to vaccinations, U.S. doctors report thousands of serious vaccine reactions each year including hundreds of deaths and permanent disabilities, fully vaccinated populations have experienced epidemics, and researchers attribute dozens of chronic immunological and neurological conditions to mass immunization programs.

There are hundreds of published medical studies documenting vaccine failure and adverse effects, and dozens of books written by doctors, researchers, and independent investigators that reveal serious flaws in immunization theory and practice. Ironically, most pediatricians and parents are completely unaware of these findings. However, this has begun to change in recent years, as a growing number of parents and healthcare providers around the world are becoming aware of the problems and starting to question the use of widespread, mandatory vaccinations.

My point it not to tell anyone whether or not to vaccinate, but rather, with the utmost urgency, to point out some very good reasons why everyone should examine the facts before deciding whether or not to submit to the procedure. As a new parent, I was shocked to discover the absence of a legal mandate or professional ethic requiring pediatricians to be fully informed, and to see first-hand the prevalence of physicians who are applying practices based on incomplete--and in some cases, outright mis--information.

Though only a brief introduction, this report contains sufficient evidence to warrant further investigation by all concerned, which I highly recommend. You will find that this is the only way to get an objective view, as the controversy is a highly emotional one.

A note of caution: Be careful trying to discuss this subject with a pediatrician. Most have staked their identities and reputations on the presumed safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and thus have difficulty acknowledging evidence to the contrary. The first pediatrician I attempted to share my findings with yelled angrily at me when I calmly brought up the subject. The misconceptions have very deep roots.

VACCINATION MYTH #1: "Vaccines are completely safe..." ...or are they?

The FDA's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System) receives about 11,000 reports of serious adverse reactions to vaccination annually, some 1% (112+) of which are deaths from vaccine reactions.[1] The majority of these reports are made by doctors, and the majority of deaths are attributed to the pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine, the "P" in DPT. This figure alone is alarming, yet it is only the "tip of the iceberg." The FDA estimates that only about 10% of adverse reactions are reported,[2] a figure supported by two National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) investigations. [3] In fact, the NVIC reported that "In New York, only one out of 40 doctor's offices [2.5%] confirmed that they report a death or injury following vaccination," -- 97.5% of vaccine related deaths and disabilities go unreported there. Implications about the integrity of medical professionals aside (doctors are legally required to report serious adverse events), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths actually occurring each year may be well over 1,000.

With pertussis, the number of vaccine-related deaths dwarfs the number of disease deaths, which have been about 10 annually for recent years according to the CDC, and only 8 in 1993, the last peak-incidence year (pertussis runs in 3-4 year cycles, though vaccination certainly doesn't). Simply put, the vaccine is 100 times more deadly than the disease. Given the many instances in which highly vaccinated populations have contracted disease (see Myth #2), and the fact that the vast majority of disease decline this century occurred before compulsory vaccinations (pertussis deaths declined 79% prior to vaccines; see Myth #3), this comparison is a valid one--and this enormous number of vaccine casualities can hardly be considered a necessary sacrifice for the benefit of a disease-free society.

Unfortunately, the vaccine-related-deaths story doesn't end here. Both national and international studies have shown vaccination to be a cause of SIDS[4,5] (SIDS is "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome," a "catch-all" diagnosis given when the specific cause of death is unknown; estimates range from 5 - 10,000 cases each year in the U.S.). One study found the peak incidence of SIDS occurred at the ages of 2 and 4 months in the U.S. , precisely when the first two routine immunizations are given,[4] while another found a clear pattern of correlation extending three weeks after immunization. Another study found that 3,000 children die within 4 days of vaccination each year in the U.S. (amazingly, the authors reported no SIDS/vaccine relationship), while yet another researcher's studies led to the conclusion that half of SIDS cases--that would be 2500 to 5000 infant deaths in the U.S. each year--are caused by vaccines.[4]

There are studies that claimed to find no SIDS-vaccine relationship. However, many of these were invalidated by yet another study which found that "confounding" had skewed their results in favor of the vaccine.[6] Shouldn't we err on the side of caution? Shouldn't any credible correlation between vaccines and infant deaths be just cause for meticulous, widespread monitoring of the vaccination status of all SIDS cases? In the mid 70's Japan raised their vaccination age from 2 months to 2 years; their incidence of SIDS dropped dramatically. In spite of this, the U.S. medical community has chosen a posture of denial. Coroners refuse to check the vaccination status of SIDS victims, and unsuspecting families continue to pay the price, unaware of the dangers and denied the right to make a choice.

Low adverse event reporting also suggests that the total number of adverse reactions actually occurring each year may be more than 100,000. Due to doctors' failure to report, no one knows how many of these are permanent disabilities, but statistics suggest that it is several times the number of deaths (see "petitions" below). This concern is reinforced by a study which revealed that 1 in 175 children who completed the full DPT series suffered "severe reactions," [7] and a Dr.'s report for attorneys which found that 1 in 300 DPT immunizations resulted in seizures. [8]

England actually saw a drop in pertussis deaths when vaccination rates dropped from 80% to 30% in the mid 70's. Swedish epidemiologist B. Trollfors' study of pertussis vaccine efficacy and toxicity around the world found that "pertussis-associated morTality is currently very low in industrialised countries and no difference can be discerned when countries with high, low, and zero immunisation rates were compared." He also found that England , Wales , and West Germany had more pertussis faTalities in 1970 when the immunization rate was high than during the last half of 1980, when rates had fallen.[9]

Vaccinations cost us much more than just the lives and health of our children. The U.S. Federal Government's National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) has paid out over $724.4 million to parents of vaccine injured and killed children, in taxpayer dollars. The NVICP has received over 5000 petitions since 1988, including over 700 for vaccine-related deaths, and there are still some two thousand total death and injury cases pending that may take years to resolve. [10] Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies have a captive market: vaccines are legally mandated in all 50 U.S. states (though legally avoidable in most; see Myth #9), yet these same companies are "immune" from accountability for the consequences of their products. Furthermore, they have been allowed to use "gag orders" as a leverage tool in vaccine damage legal settlements to prevent disclosure of information to the public about vaccination dangers. Such arrangements are clearly unethical; they force a nonconsenting American public to pay for vaccine manufacturer's liabilities, while attempting to ensure that this same public will remain ignorant of the dangers of their products.  

It is interesting to note that insurance companies (who do the best liability studies) refuse to cover vaccine adverse reactions. Profits appear to dictate both the pharmaceutical and insurance companies' positions.

"Vaccination causes significant death and disability at an astounding personal and financial cost to families and taxpayers."

VACCINATION MYTH #2: "Vaccines are very effective..."  ...or are they?

 The medical literature has a surprising number of studies documenting vaccine failure. Measles, mumps, small pox, polio and Hib outbreaks have all occurred in vaccinated populations. [11, 12, 13, 14 ,15] In 1989 the CDC reported: "Among school-aged children, [measles] outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination levels of greater than 98 percent. [16] [They] have occurred in all parts of the country, including areas that had not reported measles for years." [17] The CDC even reported a measles outbreak in a documented 100 percent vaccinated population. [18] A study examining this phenomenon concluded, "The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons." [19] A more recent study found that measles "produces immune suppression which contributes to an increased susceptibility to other infections."[19a] These studies suggests that the goal of complete immunization is actually counterproductive, a notion underscored by instances in which epidemics followed complete immunization of entire countries. Japan experienced yearly increases in small pox following the introduction of compulsory vaccines in 1872. By 1892, there were 29,979 deaths, and all had been vaccinated. [20] Early in this century, the Philippines experienced their worst smallpox epidemic ever after 8 million people received 24.5 million vaccine doses; the death rate quadrupled as a result. [21] In 1989, the country of Oman experienced a widespread polio outbreak six months after achieving complete vaccination. [22] In the U.S. in 1986, 90% of 1300 pertussis cases in Kansas were "adequately vaccinated." [23] 72% of pertussis cases in the 1993 Chicago outbreak were fully up to date with their vaccinations.[24]

"Evidence suggests that vaccination is an unreliable means of preventing disease."

VACCINATION MYTH #3: "Vaccines are the main reason for low disease rates in the U.S. today..."  or are they?

According to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, childhood diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and 1940, paralleling improved sanitation and hygienic practices, well before mandatory vaccination programs. Infectious disease deaths in the U.S. and England declined steadily by an average of about 80% during this century (measles morTality declined over 97%) prior to vaccinations. [25] In Great Britain , the polio epidemics peaked in 1950, and had declined 82% by the time the vaccine was introduced there in 1956. Thus, at best, vaccinations can be credited with only a small percentage of the overall decline in disease related deaths this century. Yet even this small portion is questionable, as the rate of decline remained virtually the same after vaccines were introduced. Furthermore, European countries that refused immunization for small pox and polio saw the epidemics end along with those countries that mandated it. (In fact, both small pox and polio immunization campaigns were followed initially by significant disease incidence increases; during smallpox vaccination campaigns, other infectious diseases continued their declines in the absence of vaccines. In England and Wales, smallpox disease and vaccination rates eventually declined simultaneously over a period of several decades.[26]) It is thus impossible to say whether or not vaccinations contributed to the continuing decline in disease death rates, or if the same forces which brought about the initial declines--improved sanitation, hygiene, improvements in diet, natural disease cycles--were simply unaffected by the vaccination programs. Underscoring this conclusion was a recent World Health Organization report which found that the disease and morTality rates in third world countries have no direct correlation with immunization procedures or medical treatment, but are closely related to the standard of hygiene and diet. [27] Credit given to vaccinations for our current disease incidence has simply been grossly exaggerated, if not outright misplaced.

Vaccine advocates point to incidence statistics rather than morTality as proof of vaccine effectiveness. However, statisticians tell us that morTality statistics can be a better measure of incidence than the incidence figures themselves, for the simple reason that the quality of reporting and record-keeping is much higher on faTalities.[28] For instance, a recent survey in New York City revealed that only 3.2% of pediatricians were actually reporting measles cases to the health department. In 1974, the CDC determined that there were 36 cases of measles in Georgia, while the Georgia State Surveillance System reported 660 cases.[29] In 1982, Maryland state health officials blamed a pertussis epidemic on a television program, "D.P.T.--Vaccine Roulette," which warned of the dangers of DPT; however, when former top virologist for the U.S. Division of Biological Standards, Dr. J. Anthony Morris, analyzed the 41 cases, only 5 were confirmed, and all had been vaccinated. [30] Such instances as these demonstrate the fallacy of incidence figures, yet vaccine advocates tend to rely on them indiscriminately.

"It is unclear what impact vaccines had on the infectious disease declines that occurred throughout this century."

VACCINATION MYTH #4: "Vaccination is based on sound immunization theory and practice..."  ...or is it?  

The clinical evidence for vaccinations is their ability to stimulate antibody production in the recipient, a fact which is not disputed. What is not clear, however, is whether or not such antibody production constitutes immunity. For example, agamma globulin-anemic children are incapable of producing antibodies, yet they recover from infectious diseases almost as quickly as other children.[31] Furthermore, a study published by the British Medical Council in 1950 during a diphtheria epidemic concluded that there was no relationship between antibody count and disease incidence; researchers found resistant people with extremely low antibody counts and sick people with high counts. [32] Natural immunization is a complex phenomenon involving many organs and systems; it cannot be fully replicated by the artificial stimulation of antibody production.

Research also indicates that vaccination commits immune cells to the specific antigens involved in the vaccine, rendering them incapable of reacting to other infections. Our immunological reserve may thus actually be reduced, causing a generally lowered resistance. [33]

Another component of immunization theory is "herd immunity," which states that when enough people in a community are immunized, all are protected. As Myth #2 revealed, there are many documented instances showing just the opposite--fully vaccinated populations do contract diseases; with measles, this actually seems to be the direct result of high vaccination rates.[19] A Minnesota state epidemiologist concluded that the Hib vaccine increases the risk of illness when a study revealed that vaccinated children were five times more likely to contract meningitis than unvaccinated children.

Carefully selected epidemiological studies are yet another justification for vaccination programs. However, many of these may not be legitimate sources from which to draw conclusions about vaccine effectiveness. For example, if 100 people are vaccinated and 5 contract the disease, the vaccine is declared to be 95% effective. But if only 10 of the 100 were actually exposed to the disease, then the vaccine was really only 50% effective. Since no one is willing to directly expose an entire population to disease--even a fully vaccinated one--vaccine effectiveness rates may not indicate a vaccine's true effectiveness.

Yet another surprising concern about immunization practice is its assumption that all children, regardless of age, are virtually the same. An 8 pound 2 month old receives the same dosage as a 40 pound five year old. Infants with immature, undeveloped immune systems may receive five or more times the dosage (relative to body weight) as older children. Furthermore, the number of "units" within doses has been found upon random testing to range from 1/2 to 3 times what the label indicates; manufacturing quality controls appear to tolerate a rather large margin of error. "Hot Lots"--vaccine lots with disproportionately high death and disability rates--have been identified repeatedly by the NVIC, but the FDA refuses to intervene to prevent further unnecessary injury and deaths. In fact, they have never recalled a vaccine lot due to adverse reactions. Some would call this infanticide.

Finally, vaccination practice assumes that all recipients, regardless of race, culture, diet, geographic location, or any other circumstances, will respond the same. This was perhaps never more dramatically disproved than an instance a few years ago in Australia's Northern Territory, where stepped-up immunization campaigns resulted in an incredible *50%* infant morTality rate in the native aborigines.[34] Researcher A. Kalokerinos, M.D. discovered that the aborigine's vitamin C deficient "junk food" diet (imposed on them by white society) was a critical factor (studies had already shown that vaccination depletes vitamin C reserves; children in shock or collapse often recovered in a matter of minutes when given vitamin C injections). He considered it amazing that as many survived as did. One must wonder about the lives of the survivors, though, for if half died, surely the other half did not escape unaffected.

Almost as troubling was a very recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine which revealed that a substantial number of Romanian children were contracting polio from the vaccine, a less common phenomena in most developed countries. Correlations with injections of antibiotics were found: a single injection within one month of vaccination raised the risk of polio 8 times, 2 to 9 injections raised the risk 27-fold, and 10 or more injections raised the risk 182 times [Washington Post, February 22, 1995].

What other factors not accounted for in vaccination theory will surface unexpectedly to reveal unforeseen or previously overlooked consequences? We will not begin to fully comprehend the scope of this danger until researchers begin looking and reporting in earnest. In the meantime, entire countries' populations are unwitting gamblers in a game that many might very well choose not to play if they were given all the "rules" in advance.

"Many of the assumptions upon which immunization theory and practice are based have been proven false in their application."

VACCINATION MYTH #5:  "Childhood diseases are extremely dangerous..."  ...or are they, really?

Most childhood infectious diseases have few serious consequences in today's modern world. Even conservative CDC statistics for pertussis during 1992-94 indicate a 99.8% recovery rate. In fact, when hundreds of pertussis cases occurred in Ohio and Chicago in the fall 1993 outbreak, an infectious disease expert from Cincinnati Children's Hospital said, "The disease was very mild, no one died, and no one went to the intensive care unit."

The vast majority of the time, childhood infectious diseases are benign and self-limiting. They also may impart lifelong immunity, whereas vaccine-induced immunity is only temporary. In fact, the temporary nature of vaccine immunity can create a more dangerous situation in a child's future. For example, the new chicken pox vaccine has an effectiveness estimated at 6 - 10 years. If effective, it will postpone the child's vulnerability until adulthood, when death from the disease is 20 times more likely.

About half of measles cases in the late 1980's resurgence were in adolescents and adults, most of whom were vaccinated as children,[35] and the recommended booster shots may provide protection for less than 6 months.[36] Furthermore, some healthcare professionals are concerned that the virus from the chicken pox vaccine may "reactivate later in life in the form of herpes zoster (shingles) or other immune system disorders." [37] Dr. A. Lavin of the Dept. of Pediatrics, St. Luke's Medical Center in Cleveland , Ohio , strongly opposed licensing the new vaccine, "Until we actually know...the risks involved in injecting mutated DNA [herpes virus] into the host genome [children]."[38] The truth is, *no one* knows, but the vaccine is now licensed and recommended by health authorities.

Not only are most infectious diseases rarely dangerous, but they can actually play a vital role in the development of a strong, healthy immune system. Persons who have not had measles have a higher incidence of certain skin diseases, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, and certain tumors, while absence of mumps has been linked to higher risks of ovarian cancer.

"Dangers of childhood diseases are greatly exaggerated
in order to scare parents into compliance with a questionable but profitable procedure."

VACCINATION MYTH #6:  "Polio was one of the clearly great vaccination success stories..."  ...or was it?

Six New England states reported increases in polio one year after the Salk vaccine was introduced, ranging from more than doubling in Vermont to Massachusetts' astounding increase of 642%. In 1959, 77.5% of Massachusetts ' paralytic cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected polio vaccine). During 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, testified that not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations (50% increase from 1957 to 1958, 80% increase from 1958 to 1959), but that the statistics were manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.[39]

According to researcher-author Dr. Viera Scheibner, 90% of polio cases were eliminated from statistics by health authorities' redefinition of the disease when the vaccine was introduced, while in reality the Salk vaccine was continuing to cause paralytic polio in several countries at a time when there were no epidemics being caused by the wild virus. (For example, in the U.S., thousands of cases of viral and aseptic meningitis are reported each year--these were routinely diagnosed as polio before the Saulk vaccine; the number of cases needed to declare an epidemic was raised from 20 to 35; and the requirement for inclusion in paralysis statistics was changed from symptoms for 24 hours to symptoms for over 60 days; it is no wonder that polio decreased radically after vaccines--at least on paper.) In 1985, the CDC reported that 87% of the cases of polio in the U.S. between 1973 and 1983 were caused by the vaccine, and later declared that all but a few imported cases since were caused by the vaccine--and most of the imported cases occurred in fully immunized individuals.

 Jonas Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate subcommittee that nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine. At a workshop on polio vaccines sponsored by the Institute of Medicine and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Samuel Katz of Duke University cited the estimated 8-10 annual U.S. cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) in people who have taken the oral polio vaccine, and the [four year] absence of wild polio from the western hemisphere. Jessica Scheer of the National Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center in Washington , D.C. , pointed out that most parents are unaware that polio vaccination in this country entails "a small number of human sacrifices each year." Compounding this contradiction are low adverse event reporting and the NVIC's experiences with confirming and correcting misdiagnoses of vaccine reactions, which suggest that the actual number of VAPP "sacrifices" may be many times higher than the number cited by the CDC.

"Vaccines caused substantial increases in polio after years of steady declines, and they are the sole cause of polio in the U.S. today."

VACCINATION MYTH #7: "My child had no short-term reaction to vaccination, so there is nothing to worry about..."  ...or is there?

The documented long term adverse effects of vaccines include chronic immunological and neurological disorders such as autism, hyperactivity, attention deficit disorders, dyslexia, allergies, cancer, and other conditions, many of which barely existed 30 years ago before mass vaccination programs. Vaccine components include known carcinogens such as thimersol, aluminum phosphate, and formaldehyde (the Poisons Information Centre in Australia claims there is no acceptable safe amount of formaldehyde which can be injected into a living human body).

Medical historian, researcher and author Harris Coulter, Ph.D. explained that his extensive research revealed childhood immunization to be "...causing a low-grade encephalitis in infants on a much wider scale than public health authorities were willing to admit, about 15-20% of all children." He points out that the sequelae [conditions known to result from a disease] of encephalitis [inflammation of the brain, a known side-effect of vaccination]: autism, learning disabilities, minimal and not-so-minimal brain damage, seizures, epilepsy, sleeping and eating disorders, sexual disorders, asthma, crib death, diabetes, obesity, and impulsive violence are precisely the disorders which afflict contemporary society. Many of these conditions were formerly relatively rare, but they have become more common as childhood vaccination programs have expanded. Coulter also points out that "...pertussis toxoid is used to create encephalitis in lab animals."

A German study found correlations between vaccinations and 22 neurological conditions including attention deficit and epilepsy. The dilemma is that viral elements in vaccines may persist and mutate in the human body for years, with unknown consequences. Millions of children are partaking in an enormous, crude experiment; and no sincere, organized effort is being made by the medical community to track the negative side-effects or to determine the long term consequences.

"The long term adverse effects of vaccinations have been virtually ignored, in spite of direct correlations with many chronic conditions."

VACCINATION MYTH #8: "Vaccines are the only disease prevention option available..." ...or are they?

 Most parents feel compelled to take some disease-preventing action for their children. While there is no 100% guarantee anywhere, there are viable alternatives. Historically, homeopathy has been more effective than "mainstream" allopathic medicine in treating and preventing disease. In a U.S. cholera outbreak in 1849, allopathic medicine saw a 48-60% death rate, while homeopathic hospitals had a documented death rate of only 3%.[40] Roughly similar statistics still hold true for cholera today.[41] Recent epidemiological studies show homeopathic remedies as equaling or surpassing standard vaccinations in preventing disease. There are reports in which populations that were treated homeopathically after exposure had a 100% success rate--none of the treated caught the disease.[42]

There are homeopathic kits available for disease prevention. [43] Homeopathic remedies can also be taken only during times of increased risk (outbreaks, traveling, etc.), and have proven highly effective in such instances. And since these remedies have no toxic components, they have no side effects. In addition, homeopathy has been effective in reversing some of the disability caused by vaccine reactions, as well as many other chronic conditions with which allopathic medicine has had little success.

"Documented safe and effective alternatives to vaccination have been available for decades but suppressed by the medical

VACCINATION MYTH #9: "Vaccinations are legally mandated, and thus unavoidable..." ...or are they?

 There are three exemption possibilities in the U.S. :

  1. Medical Exemption: All 50 states in the U.S. allow for a medical exemption. A few states allow licensed naturopathic or chiropractic doctors to issue medical exemptions in addition to medical doctors. However, few pediatricians check for indications of increased risk before administering vaccines, so it is advisable for parents to research this matter for themselves. Epilepsy, severe allergies, and siblings' previous adverse reactions are but a few of the many conditions in child or family history which may increase the chances of an adverse reaction, and thus qualify for a medical exemption;

  2. Religious Exemption: Nearly all states allow for a religious exemption. This may or may not require membership in an established religious organization, as individual state laws vary; and

  3. Philosophical or Personal Exemption: An increasing number of states allow

one of these exemptions recognizes the controversy and/or violation of freedom that mandated vaccination laws impose.

Generally, exempted children may not be banned from attending public schools and colleges except during local outbreaks. It is best to contact local school officials in advance to determine their particular procedure for handling exemptions.

The best source for a copy of your state's vaccination laws is state health officials or your public library. A phone call to the state Department of Epidemiology may be all that it takes to get a copy mailed to you.

"Legal exemptions from vaccinations are obtainable for most--but not all-- U.S. citizens."

VACCINATION MYTH #10: "Public health officials always place health above all other concerns..."  ...or do they?

Vaccination history is riddled with documented instances of deceit designed to portray vaccines as mighty disease conquerors, when in fact many times they have actually delayed and even reversed disease declines. The United Kingdom's Department of Health admitted that vaccination status determined the diagnosis of subsequent diseases: Those found in vaccinated patients received alternate diagnoses; hospital records and death certificates were falsified. Today, many doctors are still reluctant to diagnose diseases in vaccinated children, and so the "Myth" about vaccine success continues.

However, individual doctors may not be wholly to blame. As medical students, few have reason to question the information taught (which does not address the information presented in this report). Ironically, medicine is a field which demands conformity; there is little tolerance for opinions opposing the status quo. Doctors cannot warn you about what they themselves do not know, and with little time for further education once they begin practice, they are, in a sense, held captive by a system which discourages them from acquiring information independently and forming their own opinions. Those few that dare to question the status quo are frequently ostracized, and in any case, they are still legally bound to adhere to the system's legal mandates.


In the December 1994 Medical Post, Canadian author of the best-seller "Medical Mafia," Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. stated, "The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through vaccination...10 years from now we will know that the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines." After an extensive study of the medical literature on vaccination, Dr. Viera Scheibner concluded that "there is no evidence whatsoever of the ability of vaccines to prevent any diseases. To the contrary, there is a great wealth of evidence that they cause serious side effects." John B. Classen, M.D., M.B.A. has stated, "My data proves that the studies used to support immunization are so flawed that it is impossible to say if immunization provides a net benefit to anyone or to society in general. This question can only be determined by proper studies which have never been performed. The flaw of previous studies is that there was no long term follow up and chronic toxicity was not looked at. The American Society of Microbiology has promoted my research...and thus acknowledges the need for proper studies." To some these may seem like radical positions, but they are not unfounded. The continued denial of the evidence against vaccines only perpetuates the "Myths" and their negative consequences on our children and society. Aggressive and comprehensive scientific investigation is clearly warranted, yet immunization programs continue to expand in the absence of such research. Manufacturer profits are guaranteed, while accountability for the negative effects is conspicuously absent. This is especially sad given the readily available safe and effective alternatives.

Meanwhile, the race is on. According to the NVIC, there are over 250 new vaccines being developed for everything from earaches to birth control to diarrhea, with about 100 of these already in clinical trials. Researchers are working on vaccine delivery through nasal sprays, mosquitoes (yes, mosquitoes), and the fruits of "transgenic" plants in which vaccine viruses are grown. With every child (and adult, for that matter) on the planet a potential required recipient of multiple doses, and every healthcare system and government a potential buyer, it is little wonder that countless millions of dollars are spent nurturing the growing multi-billion dollar vaccine industry. Without public outcry, we will see more and more new vaccines required of us and our children. And while profits are readily calculable, the real human costs are being ignored.

Whatever your personal vaccination decision, make it an informed one; you have that right and responsibility. It is a difficult issue, but there is more than enough at stake to justify whatever time and energy it takes.

Do not use this report alone to make your vaccination decision:


To obtain a copy of Dispelling Vaccination Myths and the Vaccination Resource Directory (publishers, books, tapes, videos, newsletters, government agencies, nonprofits, vaccination alternatives, internet and WWW sources, etc.), send $5 + $2 P/H (US funds) to:

Vaccine Awareness, 
P.O. Box 62282, 
Durham, NC 27715-2282

download it free from internet address

or send email to

About the Author...

Alan Phillips is an independent investigator and writer on vaccine risks and alternatives. This report appeared in the April 1996 edition of "Wildfire Magazine," as well as numerous newsletters in the U.S. and around the world. It is being used by the Sheffield School of Homeopathy, UK. Alan has written to the Australian Minister for Human Services and Health for the Immunisation Investigation Group and the Campaign Against Fraudulent Medical Research in NSW Australia.

Alan is also the founder of Human Development Services, Inc., an international nonprofit conducting training and research in psychorientology; the designer of a national children's literacy program and materials; and a singer-songwriter and composer with albums of original songs and music in over two dozen countries on six continents. His academic achievements include a B.A. Magna Cum Laude, and election to the Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society and The National Dean's List.


(1) National Technical Information Service, Springfield , VA 22161 , 703-487-4650, 703-487-4600.

(2) Reported by KM Severyn,R.Ph.,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993. ( Ohio Parents for Vaccine Safety, 251 Ridgeway Dr. , Dayton , OH 45459 )

(3) National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206 , Vienna , VA 22180 , 703-938-0342; "Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."

(4) Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System.

(5) W.C. Torch, "Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: A potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)," (Amer. Adacemy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25 - May 1, 1982), Neurology 32(4), pt. 2.

(6) Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines [see comments]. Fine PE , Chen RT, REVIEW

ARTICLE: 38 REFS. Comment in: Am J Epidemiol 1994 Jan 15;139(2):229-30. Division of Immunization, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta , GA 30333 .

(7) Nature and Rates of Adverse Reactions Associated with DTP and DT Immunizations in Infants and Children" (Pediatrics, Nov. 1981, Vol. 68, No. 5)

(8) The Fresno Bee, Community Relations, 1626 E. Street, Fresno, CA 93786, DPT Report, December 5, 1984.

(9) Trollfors B, Rabo, E. 1981. Whooping cough in adults. British Medical Journal (September 12), 696-97.

(10) National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), Health Resources and Services Administration,

Parklawn Building , Room 7-90, 5600 Fishers Lane , Rockville , MD 20857 , 800-338-2382.

(11) Measles vaccine failures: lack of sustained measles specific immunoglobulin G responses in revaccinated adolescents and young adults. Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center , Washington , DC 20007. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 13(1):34-8, 1994 Jan.

(12) Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination strategy. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto , Ont. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 150(7):1093-8, 1994 Apr 1.

(13) Haemophilus b disease after vaccination with Haemophilus b polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine. Institution Division of Bacterial Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda , Md 20892 . American Journal of Diseases of Children. 145(12):1379-82, 1991 Dec.

(14) Sustained transmission of mumps in a highly vaccinated population: assessment of primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity. Division of Field Epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta , Georgia . Journal of Infectious Diseases. 169(1):77-82, 1994 Jan. 1.

(15) Secondary measles vaccine failure in healthcare workers exposed to infected patients. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , PA 19104 . Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 14(2):81-6, 1993 Feb.

(16) MMWR, 38 (8-9), 12/29/89).

(17) MMWR (Morbidity and MorTality Weekly Report) "Measles." 989; 38:329-330.

(18) Morbidity and MorTality Weekly Report (MMWR). 33(24), 6/22/84.

(19) Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Review article: 50 REFS. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester , MN . Archives of Internal Medicine. 154(16):1815-20, 1994 Aug 22.

(19a) Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, May 1996; 79(2): 163-170.

(20) Trevor Gunn, Mass Immunization, A Point in Question, p 15 (E.D. Hume, Pasteur Exposed-The False Foundations of Modern Medicine, Bookreal , Australia , 1989.)

(21) Physician William Howard Hay's address of June 25, 1937; printed in the Congressional Record.

(22) Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman ; evidence for widespread transmission among fully vaccinated children Lancet vol 338: Sept 21, 1991; 715-720.

(23) Neil Miller, Vaccines: Are They Safe and Effective? p 33.

(24) Chicago Dept. of Health.

(25) See Note 23 pp 18-40.

(26) See Note 23 pp 45,46 [NVIC News, April 92, p12].

(27) S. Curtis, A Handbook of Homeopathic Alternatives to Immunization.

(28) Darrell Huff, How to Lie With Statistics, p 84.

(29) quoted from the internet, credited to Keith Block, M.D., a family physician from Evanston, Illinois, who has spent years collecting data in the medical literature on immunizations.

(30) See Note 20, p 15.

(31) See Note 20 p 21.

(32) See Note 20, p 21 (British Medical Council Publication 272, May 1950)

(33) See Note 20, p 21; also Note 23 p 47 ( Buttram , MD , Hoffman, Mothering Magazine, Winter 1985 p 30;

Kalokerinos and Dettman, MDs, "The Dangers of Immunization," Biological Research Inst. [ Australia ], 1979, p 49).

(34) Archie Kalolerinos , MD , Every Second Child, Keats Publishing, Inc. 1981

(35) Reported by KM Severyn,R.Ph,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, June 3, 1995.

(36) Vaccine Information and Awareness, "Measles and Antibody Titre Levels," from Vaccine Weekly, January 1996.

(37) NVIC Press Release, "Consumer Group Warns use of New Chicken Pox Vaccine in all Healthy Children May Cause More Serious Disease".

(38) See note 35 (quoted from The Lancet)

(39) Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, Second Session on H.R. 10541, May 1962, p.94.

(40) Ullman, Discovering Homeopathy, p 42 (Thomas L. Bradford, Logic Figures, p68, 113-146; Coulter, Divided Legacy, Vol 3, p268).

(41) See Note 27.

(42) See Note 27.

(43) Golden, Isaac, Vaccination? A Review of Risks and Alternatives.

Dispelling Vaccination Myths: Unsolicited Reader Comments

"I found your Web site information to be the most credible, concise, and informative information available on the vaccination issue, and in particular, why we should immediately stop all vaccinations until some serious research is done concerning the issues you bring up. It is very difficult to find good literature to present to patients when counseling them about vaccinations, particularly when they are wanting information about why they should not vaccinate. I find this information very well written and will be using it in my medical practice..."

Ron Manzanero, MD, Austin, TX  


"I just downloaded your vaccination myth file, and I must say, I am impressed...I am an Internal Medicine resident in California, but I do not share my colleagues' view that vaccines are a panacea."

Dave D., M.D.


"I found your report disturbing and well documented...Good luck in your efforts to discover the truth."

J.D., MD, Durham, NC


"Thank you SO much for the immunizations paper -- it is SO well researched and documented."...

S.G., Ph.D., University of North Carolina


...this guy has just summarized every book I'd read to date on the vaccination issue!"



 "...It certainly seems a neat, concise summary of the various issues regarding vaccination. The no-nonsense, scientific, non-`new age' approach is appealing to someone from a scientific background such as myself."



"Thank you for giving us the facts. I am taking my first virology course and find your viewpoint refreshing and truthful."

R.S., North Dakota University


"...I've never seen as comprehensive research and references as in that article, and I plan to pass it along to my doctor, day care center, and friends."



...Your article is the perfect avenue for [my husband] to get the basic vaccine facts without exhaustive reading...Thanks for having the courage to speak out. It reinforces my decision and makes me feel like I'm not alone."



"I rushed to your article and was not disappointed. This is very clear, very informative, an excellent synthesis of a lot of informations, and very adapted to answer questions of the layperson."



"I am truly impressed with your work. You nailed some real good insights/points right squarely. I know we will be getting a lot of response from this one."

Rick McBride, Publisher, Wildfire Magazine


"One of the best posts on immunization I have ever seen! ...too bad people don't take the time to research for themselves rather than blindly believing the medical establishment. There is just so much we don't know about immunizations, not to mention all of the negative aspects that we do know!"



"Please accept my profound gratitude for your dedication and hard work in revealing the truth about one of the greatest dangers facing our children worldwide: vaccinations."

R.S. Bell, Newton Laboratories Homeopathic Medicine


 Your report is really well organized, researched, to the point and in plain, understandable English."



"I enjoyed reading your report. It is clear, concise and well organized."



Dispelling Vaccination Myths: Reprints/Reprint Requests:

A. Internet Postings:

1)Sumeria Virtual Library, Jan. 1996 - present: http://www.livelinks.com/sumeria/health/myth2.html

2) Informed Parents Vaccination Home Page, Sept. 1996 - present: http://www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/informed.htm

3) Dispelling Vaccination Myths Mirror Site, Jan. 1997 - present: http://www.ideasign.com/chiliast/vaccine/dvm1.htm


B. Reprints/Reprint requests:

1) Health Action Network , U.K. (distributor)

2) The National Vaccine Information Center , Vienna , VA

3) The Parent's Information Network, WV

4) The Vaccine Awareness Network , Australia

5) Vaccine Information and Awareness (VIA), CA

6) Sai Sanjeevini Foundation, India (distributor)

7) Hindustan Times, N. India , January 1997 (est. 1 mil readership)

C. Requests for use in college instruction:

1) Sheffield School of Homeopathy, UK, I. Townsend, Instr., fall 1996

2) UNC-Chapel Hill, School of Medicine , S. G., Ph.D., Instr., spring 1997


Source: http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness/dispelling_vaccination_myths.html

With every child (and adult, for that matter) on the planet a potential required recipient of multiple doses, and every healthcare system and government a potential buyer, it is little wonder that countless millions of dollars are spent nurturing the growing multi-billion dollar vaccine industry. Without public outcry, we will see more and more new vaccines required of us and our children. And while profits are readily calculable, the real human costs are being ignored.

Whatever your personal vaccination decision, make it an informed one; you have that right and responsibility. It is a difficult issue, but there is more than enough at stake to justify whatever time and energy it takes.

Do not use this report alone to make your vaccination decision:

Find out for yourself!

For Further Information visit the author's website at http://www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/informed.htm

Copyright © 2003, Alan Phillips


by Dr Len Horowitz



This tape will grip your attention! Dr Horowitz, a Harvard graduate with a degree in public health, is probably the world authority on the dangers of vaccinations. He is also an excellent speaker. This tape gives you much of the information you need to know about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

Order this from www.healthyworlddistributing.com

VACCINATION: 100 Years of Orthodox Research shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System

Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

The best book on vaccination! Brilliant book! This is the most well-documented indictment of vaccinations anywhere in the world.

Extensively cited with orthodox medical research studies. Required reading for anyone seriously investigating this issue.


Homeopathic Medicine for counteracting the effects of Vaccination:

While not as good as NOT getting vaccinated, I have been told by a number of healers that the homeopathic medicine Thuja was very helpful.
Here's a link that has some:

Vaccination Detox

Vaccination Liberation

Emerging Scandal in Vaccine Mandates

Shaken Babies or Vaccine Damage?

Dr Len Horowitz' website

Why I Never get Flu Shots

Postal Workers Warned against Pentagon Anthrax Vaccine

Vaccine Damage

Bush Asks Court to Seal Documents linking Autism to Vaccines

Smallpox Vaccination Risks


National Technical Information Service, Springfield , VA 22161 , 703-487-4650, 703-487-4600.

Reported by KM Severyn,R.Ph.,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News, May 28, 1993. (Ohio Parents for Vaccine Safety, 251 Ridgeway Dr. , Dayton , OH 45459)

National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206, Vienna, VA 22180, 703-938-0342; 
"Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."

Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System.

W.C. Torch, "Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: A potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS),"
(Amer. Adacemy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25 - May 1, 1982), Neurology 32(4), pt. 2.

Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines [see comments]. Fine PE , Chen RT, REVIEW ARTICLE: 38 REFS.
Comment in: Am J Epidemiol 1994 Jan 15;139(2):229-30. Division of Immunization, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta , GA 30333 .

Nature and Rates of Adverse Reactions Associated with DTP and DT Immunizations in Infants and Children" (Pediatrics, Nov. 1981, Vol. 68, No. 5)

The Fresno Bee, Community Relations, 1626 E. Street, Fresno, CA 93786, DPT Report, December 5, 1984.

Trollfors B, Rabo, E. 1981. Whooping cough in adults. British Medical Journal (September 12), 696-97.

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), Health Resources and Services Administration,
Parklawn Building, Room 7-90, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 800-338-2382.

Measles vaccine failures: lack of sustained measles specific immunoglobulin G responses in revaccinated adolescents and young adults.
Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center , Washington , DC 20007. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 13(1):34-8, 1994 Jan.

Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination strategy.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto , Ont. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 150(7):1093-8, 1994 Apr 1.

Haemophilus b disease after vaccination with Haemophilus b polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine. Institution Division of Bacterial Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda , Md 20892 . American Journal of Diseases of Children. 145(12):1379-82, 1991 Dec.

Sustained transmission of mumps in a highly vaccinated population: assessment of primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity.
Division of Field Epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta , Georgia . Journal of Infectious Diseases. 169(1):77-82, 1994 Jan. 1.

Secondary measles vaccine failure in healthcare workers exposed to infected patients. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , PA 19104 . Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 14(2):81-6, 1993 Feb.
Ingri Cassel, President
Vaccination Liberation - Idaho Chapter
P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake , ID
(208)255-2307/ 888-249-1421

" Free Your Mind.... From The Vaccine Paradigm"

"When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies."
~ U.S. Representative Ron Paul

This article was provided courtesy of

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz  and Tetrahedron Publishing Group

206 North 4th Avenue, Suite 147

Sandpoint , Idaho 83864


Toll free order line: 888-508-4787;

Office telephone: 208-265-2575;

FAX: 208-265-2775

E-mail: tetra@tetrahedron.org


 See also:





















Visit also our friends at:
" Free Your Mind.... From The Vaccine Paradigm"


Bird Flu or Cash Cow? - The Pandemic Some Want to Have

WHO's Behind Designer Germs?

by Eve Hillary ~ © 2005  Released November 15, 2005 ~ Sydney Australia


I'd finally lost my taste for TV. Its gaudy ads. Its manufactured news, mind numbing sitcoms and titty-tainment.  I'd successfully avoided TV for the entire year, until one night my finger strayed onto the button and flicked around the channels. Graphic footage of dead birds and masked "health" workers spraying people with chemicals triggered a bad case of deja` vu.


I recalled the time I'd flown to South America to give a presentation at an international Human Rights conference.  A few months previously, on March 4th 2003 the first person had been diagnosed with SARS, a brand new disease.  It was Professor Liu Jianlun, a microbiologist working in a laboratory involved in secret, government-sponsored work in China 's Guangdong province. (1)  Incredibly, he had also been "researching" the H5N1 virus, now known as the "Bird Flu".   This was closely followed by two other deaths; a Singaporean researcher working in a laboratory of the Singapore Environmental Health Institute and a post doctoral student working on West Nile virus. Singaporean Health Minister Mr. Balaji Sadasivan, stated that the researcher's exposure to the SARS virus "is most likely linked to that laboratory ... where the SARS virus is [also] cultured," (2)  It made me wonder just how many bio-hazard labs were in operation and what other new germs they were engineering.


I'd barely made my flight. My husband and I had been very busy in our Integrative (wholistic) medical clinic which offered patients a variety of orthodox as well as complementary and reliable alternative medical treatments. People traveled long distances to get treatment for cancer and other serious diseases. For most it was the first time they had been able to make lifestyle changes and receive physical, emotional and spiritual healing. They literally got a new lease of life. They felt better and looked better. 


Lately, since the media had whipped up fear of a world wide epidemic, dozens of patients visited the clinic because they were worried about SARS. The health department had issued a SARS bulletin to all doctors, which listed only 3 criteria for making the diagnosis of SARS; cough, fever and a recent trip overseas. That could include almost anyone, and I immediately became suspicious. It troubled me that authorities did not list a specific disease profile for a brand new illness that seemed to one minute reside exclusively inside biohazard laboratories and the next minute allegedly spread into human populations. I'd also noticed drug company shares rise from the sale of drugs for respiratory illness.  In our practice we found very few drugs were in fact necessary for healing and disease prevention. Our patients who had taken regular doses of vitamins, minerals, omega oils, antioxidants and other natural supplements had rarely come down with colds, flu, and other infections.  I hadn't had a cold or flu for over ten years since I had started taking regular supplements. After much illness and many attempts at personal healing, I finally realised the fact that the only thing that would keep me healthy was a functional immune system.


The day I boarded the aircraft two passengers were plucked from Sydney airport and quarantined in a Sydney Hospital .  Media reports showed masked Asian airport personnel prowling around terminals with fever detector gadgets, hauling hot and bothered travelers off into quarantine areas. Having finally made it on board I had a chance to think again about the emergence of diseases for profit, an issue which I had just published in my second book "Health Betrayal".   I thought about AIDS - a previously unheard of disease entity which emerged in the early 1980's. A few years earlier Merck pharmaceutical company had developed an experimental hepatitis vaccine which was given to gay men and Africans. By 1980 the AIDS epidemic started in those populations which had received the experimental vaccine. (3)  Since then the WHO (World Health Organization) with its close ties to pharmaceutical companies, has strictly mandated billions of doses of various types of vaccines to Africans and other third world residents where AIDS has spread like wild fire. Governments have vaccinated unwilling populations at gunpoint. One African activist, Kihura Nkuba writes; "The enthusiasm of government to give vaccines to a people that it normally gives nothing [to] was seen as very suspicious. The forcing of them to take a vaccine against a disease they know to be harmless and which they know how to cure in its harmful state was seen as government hell bent on killing its own population for the benefit of white world. All village people know that once you have recovered from measles you will never catch it again, but here they were telling people to vaccinate even those who have recovered from measles.  In other villages police armed to the teeth moved from house to house searching for children to immunize.  In 2002 Nkuba writes after a vaccination campaign; ".there was one mother who had four children, and she hid one and took three other children for vaccination, and three children died and that one survived."


It is noteworthy that of over 45 million people afflicted with HIV/AIDS worldwide, 39 million of them are in third world countries.  In 2003 the average AIDS patient, who could afford it, paid US $15,000 per year for AIDS drugs which have not been shown to be effective in the treatment of the disease. (4)


In late 2001 someone mailed anthrax bacillus to several key individuals and news organizations in the US . Two people subsequently died of anthrax.  The strain was identified as originating from Fort Detrick - a military bio-weapons facility.  The anthrax had been weaponised, its potency increased for use in biological warfare. There are few facilities known in the world to have that capacity. They include US military laboratories and a government contractor. (5)  While the mainstream media whipped up anti Muslim sentiment, drug company cash registers started ringing.  Almost immediately, sales for Cipro, an antibiotic made by Bayer hit the roof as 30,000 Americans started taking the drug, just in case. Terrified Americans thought nothing of paying US $700 for a two month supply of Cipro despite its potentially serious side effects. Other generic versions of the drug were available but not widely publicized.  The anthrax scare resulted in lucrative new drug company contracts to manufacture both anthrax and smallpox vaccinations for the military and general population. It also gave rise to the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, giving the government wide powers to quarantine, drug and inject vaccinations into persons at gunpoint in the event of a "public health emergency" being declared.   Many US states passed this Bill after September 11, which included an exemption to drug companies and vaccine makers for any vaccine deaths or injuries that would occur.  (16)  Public advocacy groups have already started work on having the Bill repealed, on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.


On the long flight I had a chance to think about the West Nile virus (WNV) which first broke out in a poor, predominately black section of New York City in August 1999, when it had never been known to exist in the US .  The virus had only ever been known in East Africa where it resulted in a mild disease that did not affect other animal and bird populations to any significant degree.  However, the new NY strain of the WNV is able to jump the species barrier. Since the year 2000 over 10,000 wild birds have died, countless horses, primates and the human death toll exceeds 146 Americans. Only the most vulnerable people die however.  As many as 200,000 people are infected and are clinically well, posing a good argument for keeping the immune system functioning well.   The new strain has spread over most eastern US states.  While health officials claim the WNV virus jumped into the U.S. from Africa , the new virulent NY strain had been cultured and engineered in Biohazard facilities for years and sold to labs around the world. 


Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies including OraVax have made millions in WNV vaccine research and products. Thomas Monath, Vice President of Research and Medical Affairs at OraVax, is one of the world's leading arbovirologists.  He became an advisor to NY Mayor Giuliani when the WNV problem first emerged in the city.  Monath had previously developed genetically engineered vaccines against WNV type organisms in his capacity as the Chief of the Virology Division, U.S. Army at Fort Detrick , Maryland .   Since the 1950s the U.S. military began developing bio-warfare weapons at Fort Detrick by cooking up germs from exotic animal diseases intended to cripple the Soviet or other enemy economies by killing horses, cattle, birds and swine with crippling new epidemics. By the 1970s new advances in genetic engineering allowed the creation of new designer viruses that jump species barriers and even cause cancer.  Since then many analysts have claimed these germs have been used for population control as well as commercial purposes with the assistance of high level US government agencies.


In fact plagues of animal diseases had badly affected the UK which had slaughtered almost 4 million animals after an outbreak of foot and mouth disease (FMD). Wikipedia defines the disease as a highly contagious but Non Fatal viral disease, meaning it is similar to the common cold in humans. If left to their own devices animals recover from the disease with permanent immunity to it.  However laboratories licensed to manipulate or engineer the FMD virus can create forms that differ from the wild virus strain. The UK animals were infected with type O pan Asia strain, which is not normally found in the UK . Foot and mouth virus "research" was carried out by Merial Animal Health.  This facility, owned by Merck and Aventis, is also a vaccine production laboratory located near Pirbright, Surrey, not far from Britain 's own government Institute for Animal Health. According to the Sunday Express, a routine audit into the government's bio-warfare research laboratory Porton Down revealed that a container of foot and mouth virus went missing two months before the outbreak in early 2001.  (7)  While it is still unknown who was responsible for the outbreak, there were certainly many who profited from it. Merck's Merial is the leading supplier of foot and mouth disease vaccine. (8)  After the UK beef market collapsed overnight, Tyson Foods, the US based largest meat and poultry producer and packer in the world expanded its international market into the UK .  The outbreak proved to be catastrophic to UK agriculture and rural families but a lucrative cash cow to multinational slaughter houses, food processors and pharmaceutical companies.


My flight arrived at midnight in Panama City , where I disembarked and waited for another flight to Columbia .  I was tired and wanted nothing more than to get on board and catch a few hours sleep, but I was about to learn a lesson  about the political benefits of unleashing fear.  Unbeknownst to me, a flight from Tokyo had arrived at San Jose International airport on red alert after the cabin crew informed US ground officials of five people aboard suspected of having SARS. The reason for the alert, as it later turned out, was that the passengers had simply coughed. Official fear mongering included few actual facts about SARS, an atypical pneumonia virus, which had only ever lived in a bio-lab before it appeared in several Asian countries simultaneously.   Of the alleged 2960 cases of SARS worldwide, 119 people died, a death rate of 4% from the virus.  In comparison, 3-5 million people are affected by seasonal influenza virus, having identical symptoms, resulting in between 250 000 and 500 000 deaths every year around the world, mainly affecting high risk groups such as the elderly, poorly mourished or chronically ill.  (10)  


Dr. Loraine Day MD, a distinguished US physician states; "The supposed disorder of "SARS": A.. CANNOT be distinguished, by its symptoms, from virtually ANY other mild or severe respiratory disorder!  And B. CANNOT be distinguished by any specific microorganism!  If I, a highly trained physician, CANNOT distinguish SARS from ANY OTHER type of routine pneumonia based on ANY of the government's published information, how are lay people going to do it? ". (12)


The atmosphere seemed unusually tense around the Panama terminal during the early hours of the morning.


I drank from my bottle of water, and cleared my throat after the dry air on the plane had irritated it.  This caught the eye of several uniformed health department personnel scanning the crowd in the transit lounge. I looked away as I felt two sets of dark eyes scanning me suspiciously.  When a passing crowd of travelers obscured the officials' view of me I hastily moved away to another lounge.  Why?  Because, new public health legislation around the world modeled on the US Model State Emergency Health Powers Act means to allow force in detaining and quarantining anyone, using the latest disease as a reason, whether it actually exists or not.  That means fasten your seatbelts travelers, because now flight attendants, cleaners, teachers, general informants and bureaucrats will be practicing medicine without a license.  Personally, I'd rather take my chances with a real doctor than an airport employee.


Bird Flu -  Pandemic of Greed


Since my trip I wondered why the first SARS deaths involved Asian scientists working in a biohazard lab with west Nile virus and bird flu. The bird flu has made its rounds yearly, severely affecting Asian countries where 117 people have allegedly been infected and 60 have allegedly died since 1997. Most deaths occurred in Vietnam , where scientific facilities are barely adequate to make a definitive diagnosis.


Prior to 1997, the wild bird flu was a rare and relatively mild virus affecting only birds.  The first case of bird flu affecting a human appeared in Asia in 1997. Apparently the wild virus had mysteriously changed to H5N1 strain, a variety that could very rarely affect humans when ingesting infected meat or in very close contact with birds. The "high path" H5N1 strain appeared suddenly and has been known to be located in many bio-hazard labs around the world.  When the Associated Press reported the death of a 60-year-old woman allegedly of bird flu, the U.S. Government halted "all chicken imports from China in a move to curb the spread of the virus."  Shortly after, the first wave of slaughter began with 1.2 million Asian chickens. By 2003, 40 million birds had been slaughtered and Tyson foods, the Arkansas based largest meat producer and packer in the world has been making steady inroads into the previously closed Asian poultry market, filling the gap in production.  The "high path" H5N1 strain hit the Asian countries hardest, such as Thailand , Japan , Vietnam and China who rely on poultry products for export and pose a real competition to giant US based meant processing corporations. These countries have had strong independent markets catering to domestic poultry needs, traditionally impenetrable to western imports.   Meanwhile the US reported a "low path" H5N2 outbreak of bird flu in Texas in 2004, which has not disrupted US exports.   Tyson Foods chief administrative officer, Greg Lee, is reported by Reuters to have said: "We are seeing and do expect to see some positive benefit as a result of disruptions in some of the Asian production," (11)    Meanwhile, since May 2005, new outbreaks of high path H5N1 bird flu strain has cut a swathe across poultry in Russia, Greece, Holland, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Romania, Mongolia and Croatia, where massive poultry exterminations have begun. The poultry infection near the eastern block has caused widespread suspicion. A member of the Liberal Democratic faction of the Russian State Duma, Aleksei Mitrofanov, has said in a parliamentary speech that bird flu was invented by Americans who wanted to dominate the world's poultry markets.  (13)


Dr. Len Horowitz , US independent public health expert writes; 'According to USA Today (October 9, 2005), "European health officials are working to contain the [avian flu] virus, which so far has not infected anyone in the region." Although, allegedly "more than 140 million birds have died or been destroyed, . . . and financial losses to the poultry sector have topped $10 billion." This propaganda actually admits, "the current virus, known as H5N1, has not yet mutated to the point at which it can easily spread from person to person." In fact, it is likely to have never spread from person to person other than during laboratory handling!'  He further states: "In not a single case has human-to-human communicability been confirmed. So long as that remains the case, there is no bird flu threat to the human population of places such as Vietnam , much less the United States ."   


DR. Nancy Cox, Chief, Influenza Branch, CDC (Centers for Disease Control) has said during a February 2004 news conference, " .As you've already heard, avian influenza viruses usually do not infect humans."   Meanwhile, the prestigious British Medical Journal editorial October 2005 Quotes; "The lack of sustained human-to-human transmission suggests that this H5N1 avian virus does not currently have the capacity to cause a human pandemic". Despite the scientific evidence to the contrary, US and global health officials insist on calling the bird flu a human pandemic. A UN spokesman David Nabarro said in late 2005; "5 million to 150 million people "could" be killed "if" the virus mutated and jumped to humans. "  While Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt, said in the US Senate; 'If it isn't the current H5N1 virus that leads to an influenza pandemic, at some point in our nation's future, another virus will."  


Meanwhile panic is being spread globally. An October 31, 2005 article in the Australian Age newspaper states;  "DISASTER experts from the Asia-Pacific region will meet in Brisbane today to discuss how to cope with a global outbreak of deadly bird flu, amid warnings that international travel would be virtually wiped out in a pandemic."  While the Canberra Times reported:  "Health Minister Tony Abbott yesterday said overseas travel would almost cease for a "significant period" if avian flu broke out in the region. " (18) Australia , regarded by some as the Asia Pacific regional policeman for implementing global policies, has not had a case of bird flu to date.


Without a sign of a human epidemic, on October 28, 2005 the US Senate passed an $8 billion emergency bill to fund research, drugs and vaccines, based on no scientific evidence that bird flu constitutes a significant human threat and overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The administration is seeking an additional $6 billion to $10 billion from US taxpayers, according to a current Business Week report.  "President Bush this week asked the leaders of the world's top vaccine manufacturers - Chiron, Sanofi-Aventis, Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck - to come to the White House on Friday to discuss preparations for pandemic flu," reports the New York Times in October.    Meanwhile taxpayer billions will also flow into the coffers of selected pharmaceutical giants such as Roche, which holds the sole license to manufacture Tamiflu, an anti viral drug that is meant only for reducing the symptoms of the seasonal influenza and has never been tested for use for the bird flu.  Thousands of Americans are lining up for their dose when there has not been a single case of H5N1bird flu in the US . Without a single human case of H5N1, Tamiflu is in such demand that a new US factory is being planned to ensure there is more of the drug available by the 2006 flu season.


Meanwhile President Bush is discussing the use of the military to enforce quarantine of suspected bird flu carriers. The US plans to install a new quarantine station at Logan International Airport to diagnose travelers. Preliminary discussions include plans to impose 10 year jail terms on people who breach orders to stay at home, in hospital or within their city during an influenza outbreak.  This has resulted in heavy opposition among independent thinkers.   The Boston Globe quotes on October 8, 2005, "On Tuesday, the president suggested that the United States should confront the risk of a bird flu pandemic by giving him the power to use the US military to quarantine ''part[s] of the country" experiencing an ''outbreak." So we have moved quickly in the past month, at least metaphorically, from the global war on terror to a proposed war on hurricanes, to a proposed war on the bird flu." (14)  


Quotes an editorial on Freemarketnews.com:  "President Bush's recent remarks about mandating vaccinations for avian flu is further evidence of the militarization of public health care and would also seem to reflect a dangerous misunderstanding about disease and palliative methodologies." Many qualified doctors would agree, including Dr. Lorraine Day MD who states; "It is virtually IMPOSSIBLE to get sick if your immune system is functioning properly".


SOLUTIONS - Are Already Here


A Culture Change is spreading around the world, albeit largely unreported by mainstream media. However, more people now source their news, and health information from the internet and alternative new publications than from the mainstream media which is funded by corporate advertisers and reflects corporate rather public interest. Fresh knowledge and truth is blowing a wind of change through every country, profession, corporation and corridor of power on the planet. The truth in fact is astonishingly powerful.  It empowers people to act, to challenge wrongs, to make informed choices, to create authentic lives, to have better options, to resist deception, to have; more power, confidence, better communication, more faith, hope, and love.  In contrast to creating wars, the truth makes for better families, better communities and more freedom. 


For example, it is increasingly known that main stream medicine is becoming the leading cause of death because it is dominated by improper drug company and bio-tech influences.  Health professionals and ethical scientists are now reporting truth in medicine and science from independent websites and alternative news publications, and millions are clicking on to get important health and scientific information. Lawyers are now tracking legal and Constitutional abuses. Activists and independent consumer advocates are now reaching millions of people, spawning a host of information and support organizations, ethical companies and investment opportunities.   Scores of former main stream journalists are becoming independent, reporting news on alternative news sites, with some creating their own popular identities as ethical broadcasters, investigative writers and filmmakers.  This alternative media is attracting millions of readers each day who have abandoned mainstream media sources. This has caused a massive resurgence of grass roots health care, activism, literature, democracy, family values, morality and spirituality, which is threatening to rattle the cages of those in power.


"Things have changed." Writes Ignacio Ramonet in La Monde. . . even the "masters of the world" are not free of trouble... the G8 leaders were besieged and publicly upstaged by upwards of 200,000 demonstrators. people are not impressed. Democratic election does not justify presidents when they betray their electoral promises and the public interest, or embark on wholesale privatization. Nor does it entitle them to move heaven and earth to service the demands of the companies that financed their electoral campaigns." 


Some Independent Sources


1. Seek a balance of information from independent media sources. http://www.michaelmoore.com/ , http://www.fintandunne.com/ , http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtmlhttp://www.independent-media.tv/index.cfm  and many other alternative media sources.


2. Public health information and health freedom sites; try  www.mercola.com , or  http://www.drday.com/   or http://www.mercola.com/2005/oct/25/avian_flu_epidemic_is_a_hoax.htm or www.evehillary.org or http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/v-kaiser.htm, http://www.credence.org/  or many others include information on how to stay healthy naturally, despite increased manufactured illness and official misinformation.                     


3. Before consenting to any vaccine, check the information from National Vaccine information Centre http://www.nvic.org/  or  http://www.avn.org.au/

 or  www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness.html 


4. Information on vaccine exemptions; http://thinktwice.com/    Also everyone has the right to make contracts or agreements with others.  You may hold your health care provider legally accountable in any jurisdiction for any administered vaccination or invasive medication or treatment by requiring them to sign a private agreement to accept full legal liability for any damages that may occur as a result of the vaccination/medication/treatment.  See http://www.vaclib.org/legal/accept1.htm or www.vaclib.org/exempt/australia.htm  for a sample agreement. Vaccine exemptions are also possible in Africa . Or enroll your child into the newly forming vaccine free preschools.


5. Support The Institute of Science in Society who want Independent science supported " to establish broad funding criteria that put public interest ahead of 'wealth creation', and to include ethical and safety considerations before the research is funded." http://www.i-sis.org.uk/ISPF7.php . Sign up for their excellent newsletter.


6. Judiciary watchdog; http://www.judgewatch.org/top/search.htm




1.       Original story appeared on April 4th only on the ITalian newspaper "La Repubblica" under the title: "Da super scienziato a grande untore il paziente zero del virus killer".. written by Marco Lupis


2.       Channelnewsasia report April 2003.


3.       Death in the Air Globalism Terrorism and Toxic Warfare by Dr. Leonard Horowitz .  Tetrahedron Publishing Group. 2001


4.       FindLaw.com, November 26, 2003


5.       Anthrax Attacks Pushed Open an Ominous Door  22 September, 2002 By Barbara Hatch Rosenberg Chair, Federation of American Scientists Working Group on Biological Weapons ,  Professor, SUNY-Purchase


6.       http://www.whale.to/a/kihura.htm


7.       http://www.greens.org/s-r/27/27-16.html


8.       http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/facts.htm


9.       http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=1320


10.     http://www.masternewmedia.org/2003/04/24/sars_separating_fact_from_fiction.htm 


11.     http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1067203/posts


12.     http://www.drday.com/sars.htm


13.     MosNews, Moscow , 21 October, 2005.


14.     Published on Saturday, October 8, 2005 by the Boston Globe, Bush's Risky Flu Pandemic Plan  by George J. Annas.


15.     Presidents under pressure By Ignacio Ramonet  in La Monde. August 2001


16.     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_State_Emergency_Health_Powers_Act


17.     "The Rise of Global Activism" A feature article by Eve Hillary 2004. www.evehillary.org


18.     Canberra Times 30 October 2005  


Hillary Eve is based in Sydney, Australia. She has been as a free-lance investigative writer for over ten years and the author of Health Betrayal and Children of a Toxic Harvest.


As an internationally published writer and speaker, Eve specializes in documenting the human impact of multinational medical and biotech corporations, emerging epidemics, gene pollution, chemical pollution, government regulators, CODEX and their implications to human health.   Eve has spent 25 years in health care as a health practitioner where she has observed the medical industry at first hand from the inside.


Eve has mainly reported on material that the mainstream media ignores.  She is convinced there is a global grass roots Health Freedom and Social Justice movement emerging that will bring about a phenomenal renaissance in the years to come.


In 2005, Eve conducted a Health Freedom campaign in Australia to preserve natural health supplements from the influence of CODEX Alimentarius. 


Knowledge is power, and Eve's primary objective is to return this power to the individuals whose lives depend on it.  She uncompromisingly believes that knowing the truth is a right that belongs to the public.   www.evehillary.org




"The Real Truth: Vaccination Inefficacy in the Reduction/Elimination of Infectious Diseases"

The fatal tendency of mankind to leave off thinking about a thing which is no longer doubtful is the cause of half their errors
-- John Stuart Mill

In 1949, the DTP vaccine was licensed to prevent diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) issuing forth the modern use of vaccines in the prevention of childhood illnesses. Polio immunization was later introduced to prevent that dread disease. In 1963, the measles vaccine was licensed and was combined with mumps and rubella toxoids to create the MMR vaccine. In more recent times the hepatitis B and chickenpox vaccines have been developed and incorporated into our healthcare system. Now a child can expect to receive up to 33 vaccines during their childhood with more vaccines on the horizon, such as herpes zoster (shingles), West Nile virus, influenza, pneumococcal, HIV, and many more.

The belief that vaccines are safe and effective is pervasive in today’s society. The vast majority of the medical, public, and government communities have a well-established belief system in the benefits of vaccines. Even children’s books show how important it is to “get a shot from the doctor to keep us well.” Our belief system is so ingrained that we look to medical science to create new vaccines to protect us from everything from AIDS to ear infections.

Unlike almost any other health-related issue in the free world, governments mandate many vaccines for the theoretical public good. In the United States , all 50 states require a large number of vaccinations before children are allowed to attend public schools or day care centers. Although most states have religious and medical exemptions, with some having a philosophical exemption, public and medical officials exert a great deal of pressure to vaccinate. The pervasive attitude that plagues will return and ravage the western world without everyone giving their child a full set of vaccinations is a powerful force in modern society.

One of the chief concepts that vaccine proponents tell us, and that we generally believe in modern society, is that the use of vaccines is responsible for the virtual elimination of many childhood scourges that used to ravage the world. We are told, and assume, that in the 1800s and early in the 1900s many diseases killed a large number of people, and that vaccines were invented and stopped these diseases from being a threat. But is this in fact the case? An immunization booklet produced by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) states the following:

“Why are baby shots so important? These shots protect your baby from nine diseases: measles, mumps, rubella (German measles), diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib disease), and hepatitis B. Are these diseases very serious? Today we might not think of these diseases as being very serious because thanks to vaccines, we don’t see them as often as we used to. … Measles used to kill hundreds – sometimes thousands – of people a year. In the 1920s, over 10,000 people a year died from diphtheria.”

“Years ago, diphtheria was a widespread and greatly feared disease. Through the 1920s, it struck about 150,000 people a year and killed about 15,000 of them. Since then these figures have dipped considerably, thanks to parents who have gotten their children vaccinated against this terrible disease. There were only 918 cases in 1960, 435 in 1970 and 128 in 1976. Today, only a few cases occur each year.”

“Before measles vaccine was available, nearly all children had measles by the time they were 15 years old. An average of 530,000 cases a year were reported in the United States during the 10 years before vaccine was available. And during each of these years, over 450 people died because of measles. Now, thanks to the measles vaccine, the number of measles each year is a fraction of what it was then.”[1]

These statements are certainly compelling. On the face of it, we cannot help but assume that vaccines have played a key role in improving all of our lives. But looking carefully at the evidence over a longer period of time reveals a different picture of disease evolution and the role vaccines have played. One Swiss scientist that analyzed data over a longer period of time came to a different conclusion of what occurred in Switzerland :

“An analysis has been made of the evolution in Switzerland of morTality due to the main infectious diseases ever since the causes of death began to be registered. MorTality due to tuberculosis, diphtheria, scarlet fever, whooping cough, measles, typhoid, puerperal fever and infant gastro-enteritis started to fall long before the introduction of immunization and/or antibiotics. The decline was probably due to a great extent to various factors linked to the steady rise in the standard of living: qualitative and quantitative improvements in nutrition; better public and personal hygiene; better housing and working conditions and improvements in education.”[2]

In that research paper, several graphs of death rates in Switzerland show massive drops in deaths from disease long before vaccinations are introduced. One graph shows diphtheria death rates for children from 0 to 14 years of age peaking at over 200 deaths per 100,000 in the late 1800s. This is followed by death rates decreasing to less than 10 deaths per 100,000 near the time of the introduction of the vaccine in the mid 1930s. There was an apparent 95 percent decrease in diphtheria death rates before introduction of the vaccine. Another graph within the same study shows scarlet fever decreasing from 200 deaths per 100,000 in the late 1800s to virtually zero by the 1930s before drug treatments were introduced. Yet another graph in the study shows typhoid also decreasing from 50 deaths per 100,000 in 1876 to virtually zero by the 1940s when drug treatments were introduced.

A review of “Childhood’s Deadly Scourge” states:

“During the last two decades of the 19th century diphtheria was the leading cause of death of toddlers in the industrialized world, in some cities killing more than a thousand in a single year. In contrast, since 1980 fewer than 100 cases have been reported in the entire United States . Although diphtheria is hardly the only infectious disease to have thus faded, its story is unique because the early period of its decline can be directly linked to advances in bacteriologic knowledge and practice. Between 1880 and 1930 health authorities in New York City were responsible for much of the practical innovation in the control of diphtheria, as well as a good share of scientific progress.”[3]

The Vital Statistics of the United States contains compiled statistics for a wide variety of information since early in the 1900s. Among those are death rates from all diseases, including infectious diseases. An introductory statement from the 1937 statistics indicates that death rates from infectious diseases declined greatly in the early part of the century. These declines occurred well before the advent of vaccines to treat these conditions.

“The trend in death rates for specific causes, over the past 20 or 30 years, may be characterized by two general statements. In the first place, there has been a great reduction in the death rates for infectious and preventable diseases; in the second place, there has been an increase in the rates for certain diseases characteristic of older ages. Greatest proportional rate decreases have taken place for such diseases as typhoid and parathyroid fever, which has declined from a rate of 23.5 in 1910 to 2.1 in 1937; and diphtheria, which declined from a rate of 21.4 in 1910 to 2.0 in 1937. … The rate reductions for infectious and preventable diseases can be largely attributed to the development of modern public-health practice.”[4]

From these figures, we can see that death rates from typhoid decreased by 91% from 1910 to 1937 and death rates from diphtheria declined by 90.5% during the same time period. The decrease in diphtheria occurred well before the use of vaccination.

An even a more recent editorial statement from the Journal of Pediatrics states that proper sanitation was largely responsible for the early large declines in infectious diseases.

“… the largest historical decrease in morbidity and morTality caused by infectious disease was experienced not with the modern antibiotic and vaccine era, but after the introduction of clean water and effective sewer systems.”[5]

Again, in a 2001 paper in the Journal of Infection Control: 
“The conquest of infectious disease and the health revolution it initiated is arguably one of the greatest achievements of Western civilization. Yet the phenomenon is largely unknown and rarely taught, even in history courses. Conventional wisdom usually assumes that conquest of infectious disease can be credited to well-known lifesaving innovations in medicine such as vaccines, antibiotics, and surgical asepsis. These icons are truly essential ingredients of modern medicine, and their contribution to human life and health in this century can never be minimized. However, except for the smallpox vaccination, which was introduced in 1798 and made compulsory in England in 1853, the overall contribution of medical innovations to the health revolution of the 1800s is difficult to validate. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine arrived on the scene only after disease morTality rates already had been reduced significantly; measles, rubella, and polio vaccines did not become available until the middle of the 20th century, when most infant deaths were the result of other causes. The same holds true for sulfa drugs and antibiotics. Their contribution is unequivocal, but they did not affect morTality rates until the 1940s.” [6]

Another paper published in the premier medical journal The Lancet in 1977 by the Department of Community Medicine in the United Kingdom also indicates that vaccines were not responsible for the decline in disease rates in that country.

“There was a continuous decline [whooping cough deaths], equal in each sex, from 1937 onward. Vaccination, beginning on small scale in some places around 1948 and on a national scale in 1957, did not affect the rate of decline if it be assumed that one attack usually confers immunity, as in most major communicable diseases of childhood. … The steady decline of whooping cough between 1930 and 1957 is predictive of a linear exponential decay characteristic of a general and progressive lessening in the volume and spread of infection among the susceptible population. With this pattern well established before 1957, there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and morTality in the trend of events.”[7]

The author’s conclusion that “there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and morTality” is quite monumental and far different than the general public perception.

Thomas McKeown who was Professor of Social Medicine in the University of Birmingham Medical School between 1950 and 1978, is still regarded as a major social philosopher of medicine, and known for his important works on epidemiology and the practice and purpose of medicine. His conclusion was also that diseases were declining well before medical interventions such as vaccinations came into standard use.

“The distinguished epidemiologist Thomas McKeown (1912-1988) maintained that reductions in deaths associated with infectious diseases (air-, water-, and food-borne diseases) cannot have been brought about by medical advances, since such diseases were declining long before effective means were available to combat them.” [8]

Another author shows that disease and morTality was falling before the advent of vaccines or drug therapies:

“… in 1869 there were 716 deaths from typhus in London ; by 1885 this had been reduced to 28; and at the beginning of the twentieth century there was none. Similar declines could be given for other infectious diseases. Tuberculosis began a remarkable disappearing act. Killing perhaps 500 out of every 100,000 Europeans in 1845, consumption slowly but continuously sank to 50 per 100,000 by 1950. Curative medicine played little part in that transition. The disappearance began before Koch discovered the tubercle bacillus. By the time antibiotics entered the picture, TB in cities such as New York had fallen to eleventh place in the death lists. And the morTality graphs for most of Europe ’s fatal crowd diseases all dived before antibiotics had been marketed. Whooping cough killed 1400 children out of every million in 1850, but one hundred years later whooping deaths were less than 10 per million. Scarlet fever behaved in the same way. Measles, typhus, pneumonia, dysentery and polio all share similar histories. Their retreat had a dramatic impact on the European population. By 1900 civilization had lost its biological population check: infectious disease. After centuries of hostile encounters, humans and microbes found a new adjustment with little interference from drugs or vaccines. In some cases the microbe became less virulent (measles and diphtheria) or the human host more resistant (tuberculosis).” [9]

In the view of this, how can the statements made by the CDC on how “thanks to vaccines” diseases are a thing of the past be correct? Back in 1924 Mark Twain was quoted as saying, “There are three kinds of lies — lies, damned lies, and statistics.” When Mark Twain made this statement, his point was that numbers could be manipulated by the unscrupulous to misrepresent facts, to justify a particular bias, or fulfill a particular agenda. It is an unhappy fact of modern life that anyone with an idea can support that idea with statistics. The less the public knows about the source of the statistics, the more possible it is to have misinformation posing as scientific results.

Simple statements, such as “in the 1920s, over 10,000 people a year died from diphtheria”, although accurate are very misleading. Providing a piece of historical fact without any real context and mixing it with statements on how vaccines helped cure these diseases leads the reader to erroneously conclude that vaccines were instrumental in the massive declines of deaths from these diseases.

The CDC’s statements on vaccines only provide a few facts and then draw a conclusion on this limited information. To understand the role of vaccines, we must use the raw information and analyze it over a long period of time. The Vital Statistics of the United States provides the most accurate information of death rates from various causes starting early in the 1900s.[10] Figure 1 is a graph of the death rates from measles, typhoid, scarlet fever, whooping cough (pertussis), and diphtheria. Both the pertussis and diphtheria vaccines were made widely available in 1949 and the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963.

Figure 1. Death rates from infectious diseases

This graph shows that large drops in disease death rates occurred long before vaccines were introduced. From 1900 to 1963, when the measles vaccine was introduced, death rates from measles had declined from 13.3 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000 – a 98% decrease. From 1900 to 1949, death rates from whooping cough declined from 12.2 per 100,000 to 0.5 per 100,000 – a 96% decrease. From 1900 to 1949, death rates from diphtheria declined from 40.3 per 100,000 to 0.4 per 100,000 – a 99% decrease. These are clear and major changes in the severity of diseases well before any vaccines were introduced. Close up views (figures 2- 4) of the diphtheria, pertussis, and measles death rates show this dramatic drop well before vaccination programs began.

Figure 2. Death rates from Diphtheria

Figure 3. Death rates from Pertussis

Figure 4. Death rates from Measles

Similarly, in England and Wales we find the same decline in disease morTality. The data for the disease morTality was recorded 50 years earlier than in the United States , beginning in 1850. [11]

From 1850 to 1968, when the measles vaccine was introduced, death rates from measles had declined from a range of 52.11 to 26.6 per 100,000 to 0.11 per 100,000 – a range of 99.8% to 99.6% decrease. From 1860 to 1955, death rates from whooping cough declined from a range of 43.73 to 60.86 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000 – a 99.5% to 99.7% decrease. From 1859 to 1940, death rates from diphtheria declined from a range of 49.2 to 22.7 per 100,000 to 6.77 to 1.83 per 100,000 – a 96.2% to 70.2% decrease. The exact decrease in morTality is difficult to obtain because the morTality from these diseases fluctuated from year to year, and the exact introduction of a vaccination and number of people vaccinated each year is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain. However, it is clear that death rates in England did to a large extent decline before vaccinations were widespread.

Figure 5 is a graph that shows the morTality rate declines in England and Wales . The gap from 1891 to 1900 is because data was not acquired for those specific dates.

Figure 5. Death rates from infectious diseases in England
and Wales

The modern era of vaccines actually began with the advent of the vaccine against smallpox. Edward Jenner was aware of the belief that people who contracted cowpox never contracted smallpox. He hypothesized that inoculating people with cowpox would immunize them against smallpox. On May 14, 1796, he inoculated an eight-year-old boy, named James Phipps, with matter taken from a cowpox pustule. Phipps developed coxpox and quickly recovered. Several weeks later, Phipps was inoculated with smallpox and did not contract the disease. In 1798, Jenner reported his work in the book, “An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccine.” This book prompted the medical professionals of the time to adopt the practice of vaccination. The vaccine was introduced in England in 1798. It was later made compulsory in 1853 through the Compulsory Vaccination Act, and then in 1867, an even more stringent law was passed to enforce vaccination.

Looking at the raw data from England during that era [12], as shown in Figure 6, we see that despite enforced vaccinations against smallpox there was no significant decrease in deaths from smallpox. In fact, three major epidemics during 1857-1859, 1863-1865, and 1871-1872 occurred, even though there was a high vaccination rate. The last major epidemic in 1871-1872 had death rates of 101.2 and 82.1 per 100,000 people respectively, occurring just four years after a newer and more strict vaccination law was enacted in 1867.

Figure 6. Death rates from smallpox and scarlet fever in England .

Another interesting point is that the smallpox disease cycle of decreased deaths and epidemics appears closely tied to the scarlet fever disease cycle. Just as there was a large decrease in scarlet fever deaths after 1885, there was simultaneously a decrease in smallpox deaths. It is important to remember that death from scarlet fever, which was the worst of infectious diseases in that era, was eliminated without any vaccination program.

Figure 7 shows that vaccination coverage had no apparent affect on smallpox deaths. As coverage fell to from a high of 86% in 1879 to 61% in 1898 there was no resurgence of smallpox deaths. There was a small increase in smallpox deaths to 7.5 per 100,000 people as vaccine coverage rates again increased to 71.8% in 1902, but there after, as vaccine rates fell to below 40%, there was no increase in smallpox deaths. In fact, after 1905, deaths from smallpox almost completely vanished.

Figure 7. Smallpox deaths and vaccination percent of births.

We must also remember that deaths were directly attributable to the smallpox vaccine. Figure 8 shows the deaths per 100,000 that were caused by the smallpox vaccine. Although the number of people that died from the vaccine is small compared to the number of people that were killed directly by smallpox, after 1888 there were years that the deaths from the vaccine was close to or exceeded that from the disease itself (e.g. 1889 – smallpox: 23, vaccine: 58; 1890 – smallpox: 16, vaccine: 43; 1891 – smallpox: 49, vaccine: 43). After 1905, as can be seen in Figure 9, the number of deaths from smallpox and vaccination were very close to one another. In point of fact, after 1905, a person was almost as likely to die from the vaccine for smallpox as from the disease itself.

Figure 8. Deaths per 100,000 from cowpox and other effects of vaccination.

Figure 9. Actual smallpox and smallpox vaccination deaths.

Another interesting point of note is that certain diseases that also once killed many people declined and vanished without any assistance from mass vaccination programs. Typhoid death rates of 10s per 100,000 each year was not uncommon. Scarlet fever once killed large numbers of people at a death rate of 100 or more per 100,000 each year. While quite deadly during their prime, these two “killers” were in effect eradicated due in large part to advances in hygiene and a better understanding of germ activity. The Canadian Medical Journal contains the following statements in an advisory statement:

“Typhoid fever is caused by Salmonella typhi, which affects only humans, often causing serious systemic illness. The organism is generally transmitted by the feces or urine of the people with the disease or those who are the S. typhi carriers. The death rate is approximately 16% for untreated cases and 1% for those given appropriate antibiotic therapy. … The incidence of typhoid fever is very low in all of the industrialized countries. Approximately 70 cases are reported in Canada and 190 in the United States annually. The low incidence of typhoid fever in these countries is attributable to improved living conditions, better drinking-water quality and the treatment of sewage. The vaccine does not seem to play an important role in maintaining this lower incidence. Most infections occurring in the industrialized countries are acquired elsewhere. … It is certain that vaccination does not afford adequate protection when heavily contaminated foods are ingested. … There cannot be too much emphasis placed on hygiene and food precautions; these measures appear to be the most effective protection against the disease.”[13]

If the forces of improved living conditions, better drinking water quality and the treatment of sewage virtually eliminated illnesses such as typhoid and scarlet fever, then isn’t it reasonable to consider that other diseases, such as measles and pertussis, would have had similar fates? An analysis of the death rates for all these diseases does support this idea. The Conquest of Disease by Thurman B. Rice, MD from 1932 states:

“The benefit of pure water is expressed not only by the lowering of the typhoid rate but also in a considerable lowering of other death rates, and even of the general death rate. … Why has the death rate [for Scarlet fever] markedly fallen in the days before the cause of the disease was understood? It must be remembered that a given germ is only part of the cause of a disease; there are often many other very important contributing, predisposing, or determining factors. As housing conditions were improved, as the general laws of sanitation, ventilation, and personal hygiene came to be better understood; as we came to insist on individual drinking cups; fresh air in bedrooms, and frequent bathing; as doctors became more proficient in treating the infection so as to prevent its serious complications and sequelae; as boards of health became more efficient in the enforcement of public health laws; as methods of isolation and disinfection were better understood the death rate declined accordingly.”[14]

Again, the major decline in morTality rates can be attributed to improvements in proper hygiene, not only at a societal structural level, but also due to major changes in attitude in personal hygiene.

“In addition to the seminal and recognized role of environmental hygiene, a substantial but overlooked component of the health revolution was the transformation in personal hygiene practices and cleanliness. The transformation probably started in the early 1800s, became extremely popular from 1890 to 1915, and has since become an essential feature of “civilized” behavior in the United States and Europe . It is proposed that this mass behavioral changes in washing, bathing, laundering, and domestic hygiene practices contributed significantly to the continuing reduction of illness and death rates at the beginning of the 20th century.” [15]

It would appear that, at best, vaccines could be credited with only a tiny fraction of the overall decline of disease deaths in the 1800s and 1900s. Because death rates were declining, it is impossible to say whether vaccines had a real effect or if that the same forces that caused the majority of the decline would have continued to have a positive impact. Those forces were primarily that of improved sanitation, proper personal hygiene, improved diet, and the natural cycles of disease.

Based on our knowledge that proper sanitation, improved living conditions, and improved nutrition were the key factors that caused declines in these diseases, we can ask the question: are the present deaths and complications from these diseases in people of poor socioeconomic or compromised nutritional status? Is it possible that the focus on mass vaccination programs diverted attention from continued improvements in sanitation and nutrition that could have further reduced or eliminated disease deaths and complications?

It would seem that the people who recognized the underlying cause of diseases and instituted better living conditions, proper water and better sanitation should be recognized for their remarkable achievements, not the inventors and promoters of vaccines. This analysis, which is based on historical and scientific studies, is a far different picture than the one alluded to by the CDC in their vaccine literature.

Because the focus has predominantly been on medical intervention, the history of what really caused the decline in disease morTality is “largely unknown” and “rarely taught”. The information that disease death declined before vaccination is important in the present day because we need to pay attention to these underlying causes of infectious disease. We must be ever vigilant to avoid returning to those disease-causing conditions and to examine these conditions when disease outbreaks occur. It is an important lesson in how we should approach disease prevention in third world countries. We should not forget the words of George Santayana: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."


[1] Parent’s Guide to Childhood Immunization. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program, Atlanta Georgia 30333, 1993, pp. 1, 7, 21

[2] Gubéran, E., “Tendances de la morTalité en Suisse”, Schweiz. Med Wschr. 110, 1980, pp. 574-583

[3] Morman, E.T., “Childhood’s Deadly Scourge: The Campaign to Control Diphtheria in New York City , 1880-1930”, The Journal of the American Medical Association, April 12, 2000 Vol. 283, p. 1889

[4] Vital Statistics of the United States 1937 Part I, U.S. Department of the Census, 1939, p. 11

[5] “Zinc, diarrhea, and pneumonia (editorial)”, The Journal of Pediatrics, December 1999, Vol. 135, No. 6, p. 663

[6] Greene, Velvl W., PhD, MPH, “Personal hygiene and life expectancy improvements since 1850: Historic and epidemiologic associations”, American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC), August 2001, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 203-206

[7] Steward, Gordon T., “Vaccination Against Whooping-Cough Efficacy Versus Risks”, The Lancet, January 29, 1977, pp. 234-237

[8] Porter, Roy , “The Greatest Benefit to Mankind”, Harper Collins Publishers, 1997, p. 426

[9] Porter, Roy , “The Greatest Benefit to Mankind”, Harper Collins Publishers, 1997, p. 427

[10] Vital Statistics of the United States 1937 Part I, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1939, pp. 11-12; Vital Statistics of the United States 1938 Part I, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1940, p. 12; Vital Statistics of the United States 1943 Part I, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1945; Vital Statistics of the United States 1944 Part I, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1946, p XXII-XXIII; Vital Statistics of the United States 1949 Part I, U.S. Public Health Service, 1951, p. XLIV; Vital Statistics of the United States 1960 Volume II – MorTality Part A, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1963, p. 1-25; Vital Statistics of the United States 1967 Volume II – MorTality Part A, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1969, p. 1-7; Vital Statistics of the United States 1976 Volume II – MorTality Part A, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1980, p. 1-7; Vital Statistics of the United States 1987 Volume II – MorTality Part A, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990, p. 11; Vital Statistics of the United States 1992 Volume II – MorTality Part A, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996, p. 12; Historical Statistics of the United States – Colonial Times to 1970 Part 1, Bureau of the Census, p. 58

[11] MorTality in England and Wales for 95 years as provided by the Office of National Statistics - Published 1997;

[12] Written answer by Lord E. Percy to Parliamentary question addressed by Mr. March, M.P., to the Minister to Health on July 16th, 1923

[13] “Statement on overseas travelers and typhoid fever”, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1994, 151, pp. 989-990

[14] Rice, Thurman, A.M., MD The Conquest of Disease, The Macmillan Company, 1932, pp. 68, 121-122

[15] Greene, American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC), August 2001, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 203-206

Roman Bystrianyk is an investigative reporter for HealthSentinel.com

Last update on February 23, 2003

This information is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical care. If you have or suspect you have a serious health problem, you should consult a qualified health care provider.

Source: http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness/vaccination_inefficacy.html


Innoculations - The True Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Causing VIDS (Vaccine Induced Diseases) An Epidemic Of Genocide

By Rebecca Carley, M.D.

1-29-5  Court Qualified Expert in VIDS and Legal Abuse Syndrome

"One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth. And there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth." (by Delamar Duvaris as written in the preface of "Behold the Pale Horse" by William Cooper).

The basic truth that served as the foundation for the mountain of lies known as vaccinations was the observation that mammals who recover from infection with microorganisms acquire natural immunity from further infections. Whenever T cells (the little packman cells which kill viruses, bacteria, and cancer cells, thus conferring cellular immunity) and B cells (antibody producing cells which confer humoral immunity) are activated by various substances foreign to the body called antigens, some of the T and B cells become memory cells. Thus, the next time the individual meets up with that same antigen, the immune system can be quickly triggered to demolish it. This is the process known as immunity.

This truth gave birth to a beLIEf that if a foreign antigen was injected into an individual, that individual would then become immune to a future infection. This beLIEf, (you see the lie in the middle), was given the name, "vaccinations". What the promoters of vaccination failed to realize is that the respiratory tract of ALL mammals (since animals are just as devastated by these inoculations with disease as are humans) contain secretory IgA (an antibody which initiates the natural God given immune response) within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting organisms into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune system.

 The mechanism by which the immune system is corrupted can best be realized when you understand that the two poles of the immune system (the cellular and humoral mechanisms) have a reciprocal relationship. Thus, when one is stimulated, the other is inhibited. Since vaccines activate the B cells to secrete antibody, the T cells are subsequently suppressed. This suppression of the cell mediated response is a key factor in the development of cancer and life threatening infections. In fact, the "prevention" of a disease via vaccination is, in reality, an inability to expel organisms due to the suppression of the cell-mediated response. Thus, rather than preventing disease; they actually prevent the disease from ever being resolved. The organisms continue circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other organisms (as demonstrated by the work of Professor Antoine Bechamp), depending on the acidity and toxicity of the internal terrain of the body. Note that Bechamp proved that Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" of disease was incorrect due to this ability of organisms to transform and mutate based on the body's internal terrain (as Pasteur admitted on his deathbed). Thus, treatment of infection with antibiotics as well as "prevention" of disease with vaccines are both just examples of cutting off the branches of dis-ease, when the root of the cause is a toxic internal environment. However, since Pasteur's germ theory was conducive to the profits of the burgeoning pharmaceutical companies who only manage dis-ease, no mention of the work of Professor Bechamp has been made in medical school curricula.

To make matters worse than the suppression of cellular immunity which occurs when vaccines are injected, adjuvants (which are substances added to vaccines to enhance the antibody response) can actually lead to serious side effects themselves. Adjuvants include oil emulsions, mineral compounds (which may contain the heavy metal aluminum), bacterial products, liposomes (which allow delayed release of substances), and squalene. The side effects of adjuvants themselves include hyperactivity of B cells leading to pathologic levels of antibody production, as well as allergic reaction to the adjuvants themselves (as demonstrated in Gulf War I soldiers injected with vaccines containing the adjuvant squalene, to which antibodies were found in many soldiers). Note that the pathologically elevated hyperactivity of antibody production caused by adjuvants also results in a distraction from the other antigens that the immune system encounters "naturally", which must be addressed to maintain health.

This hyperactivity of the humoral (antibody producing) pole of the immune system is, in this author's opinion, the sole cause of all autoimmune diseases. The only thing which determines which autoimmune disease you develop is which tissues in your body are attacked by auto-antibodies. If the inside lining of the gastrointestinal tract (the mucosa) is attacked by auto-antibodies you develop leaky gut syndrome (which leads to food allergies when partially digested food particles are released into the bloodstream, are recognized as antigens foreign to the body, and elicit an antibody response against those food particles that becomes heightened every time that same food is eaten and released into the bloodstream partially digested again). Crohn's disease and colitis are also caused by auto-antibody attack on the mucosa of the GI tract itself. If the islet (insulin producing) cells of the pancreas are attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop insulin dependent (juvenile) diabetes. If the respiratory mucosa is attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop "leaky lung" syndrome where, just as with leaky gut, antigens recognized as foreign to the body which are inhaled are able to traverse the lining of the respiratory tract, causing the creation of antibodies against those antigens (usually dust, mold, pet or pollen antigens). When these substances are inhaled again, the allergic response producing constriction of the bronchioles is called asthma. If the components of the articular surface of the joints are attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop rheumatoid (or juvenile) arthritis. If the skin is attacked, you develop "leaky skin" syndrome, where contact antigens which could not otherwise traverse the skin are allowed in, leading to skin allergies to contact antigens. Additionally, depending on which level of the skin is attacked by auto-antibodies, (i.e., the epidermis or dermis), you develop eczema, psoriasis or scleroderma. If the kidney tissue is attacked by auto-antibodies, you develop one of the many types of nephritis, depending on which component of renal tissue is attacked (for example, with glomerulonephritis, the basement membrane of the glomerular apparatus within the kidney (which filters blood to form urine) is attacked by auto-antibodies, thus allowing protein to escape from the serum into the urine). If you develop auto-antibodies against thyroid gland tissue, you develop Grave's disease. If you develop auto-antibodies against the tissue of the thymus gland (which is crucial in T cell production and function), you develop myasthenia gravis. If you develop auto-antibodies against the very DNA in the nucleus of all cells, you develop systemic Lupus (thus, the potential autoimmune potential of DNA vaccines being developed now is self evident; worse yet, DNA components from these vaccines can be incorporated into your DNA, leading to actual genetic changes which could cause extinction of all (vaccinated) life on the Earth). And on, and on, and on.

The brain and spinal cord can also be attacked with auto-antibodies (which this author refers to as vaccine induced encephalitis), leading to a variety of neurological diseases. The most severe of these, leading to death, are sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and most cases of "shaken baby syndrome". If components of the myelin sheath (the insulating covering of nerve fibers which allows proper nerve conduction) or the actual neurofilaments themselves are attacked by auto-antibodies, the resultant condition is determined solely by the location of the damage done. Such neurological conditions include but are not limited to minimal brain dysfunction, ADD/ADHD, learning disabilities, mental retardation, criminal behavior, the spectrum of pervasive developmental disorders (including autism), multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's, Lou Gehrig's disease, Guillen Barre,, seizure disorders, etc., etc. etc. (Please note that other toxins are also sometimes involved, such as: aspartame, Lymes and mercury in cases of MS; aspartame in seizures; or pesticides in cases of Parkinson's). Thus, when detoxing to reverse these diseases, these other substances must also be detoxed to obtain a full recovery. However, the corruption of the immune system caused by the injection of vaccines is a key component in these disease states leading to immune malfunction, and is the reason why an autistic child may also have leaky gut or eczema, etc. Note that myelin production, for the most part, does not begin until after birth. Most myelin is apparently laid down by age 5 years and usually completed by age 10 years, judging by the level of success at various ages in reversing autistic and other neurological VIDS symptoms that this author has observed in hundreds of children by detoxing the viruses with homeopathic nosodes, and repairing the immune corruption by simultaneous administration of bovine colostrum (i.e., after 10 years of age, the ability to stop and repair auto-antibody induced damage in the myelin sheath and neurofilaments themselves is dramatically decreased).

Thus, the hyperactivity of the humoral arm of the immune system in autoimmune disease is caused by adjuvants added just for that purpose. However, the autoimmunity itself (i.e., antibody against self) has several mechanisms, including the following:

  1. The antigens present in the culture media itself cannot be completely filtered and separated from the organisms cultured thereon. Thus, any antibodies formed against antigens from the culture cells themselves (for example myelin basic protein from chick embryos or the 13 vaccines which now contain aborted fetal cells) can cross-react to form an autoimmune reaction against the myelin basic protein in your myelin sheath, etc.

  2. Molecular mimicry is due to similarity of proteins contained in organisms and mammals. (For example, the measles virus is made up of proteins similar to myelin basic protein; thus, antibodies formed against the measles virus antigens subsequently also cause an auto-antibody attack against myelin basic protein in the myelin sheath due to cross reactivity of these antibodies).

  3. intentional inclusion of antigens in vaccines to cause formation of antibodies that attack specific hormones or races (for example, experiments done on women of childbearing age in the Philippines and probably other locations where HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin, the hormone produced when women first become pregnant) placed into vaccines given these women resulted in antibodies against the HCG hormone, and subsequent spontaneous abortion thus occurred when the women became pregnant. It is also this author's hypothesis that the epidemic of vitiligo in people of color (hypo pigmentation of skin caused by auto-antibody attack on melanocytes (melanin producing cells) in skin) is also occurring due to intentional inclusion of melanin in vaccines given to people of color.

In addition to the above phenomena which lead to simultaneous depression of cellular immune function and hyperactivity of humoral immune function, vaccines also contain other toxic substances which can cause serious side effects themselves. The following ingredients are actually listed on the CDC website with this introductory statement: "Many things in today's world, including food and medicines, have chemicals added to them to prevent the growth of germs and reduce spoilage." Translation: you,re already toxic, so what's the big deal with adding more poison? This author's answer to that question is that any immunotoxin can end up being the "straw that breaks the immune system's back" in that individual, leading to dis-ease. This is where genetics is key; i.e., not that what disease you develop is actually caused by some "gene" in most cases; but rather that your genes determine the strength of your immune system (i.e., how many assaults your immune system can take before it reaches critical mass, and you develop a dis-ease).

Some additional ingredients in vaccines (as listed by the CDC on their website) include antibiotics, aluminum gels, formaldehyde, monosodium glutamate (MSG), egg protein, and sulfites. Thus, we have antibiotics (which you could be allergic to); aluminum (highly involved in causing Alzheimer's disease); formaldehyde (a toxic carcinogenic substance used to pickle dead people); MSG ( a potent excitotoxin which, like aspartame, can cause seizures, brain tumors, etc.); egg protein (to which you could have a life threatening anaphylactic reaction); and sulfites (another toxin which we are advised not to consume much of orally, but in vaccines, it is injected directly into the blood stream). Is this not a veritable witch's brew of chemicals, organisms, and animal or human (aborted fetus) body parts? Note in this list that they do not mention the ethyl-mercury containing preservative thimerosol, which has been the only dangerous substance in vaccines to receive mainstream media attention (albeit most of that being disinformation) after the explosion in the rate of occurrence of autism in the last generation became self-evident proof that vaccines are the causative factor. For, although the scientists working for the medical mafia continue to use statistics to twist and spin their data to make us beLIEve that vaccines are not the cause, too many thousands of parents have watched their children enter the downward spiral into autism after their children received the vaccine which was the straw that broke the back of their child's immune system. No matter what the "white coats" tell these parents; they know the truth!

Mercury (also in dental amalgam fillings) is a highly toxic heavy metal, has been documented to cause cancer, and can be absorbed through the digestive track, skin, and respiratory track. Mercury is 1,000 times more toxic than lead, and is second only to uranium as the most toxic metal. If children receive all recommended vaccines, they will receive 2,370 times the "allowable safe limit" for mercury in the first two years of life (as if there is such a thing as a "safe" amount of a toxic poison). Yet, even after Congressional hearings instigated by Congressman Dan Burton (whose own grandchild became autistic after receiving vaccines) resulted in the FDA requesting (not ordering) vaccine manufacturers to remove this toxic heavy metal from their products, mercury is still present in many vaccines.

Although the symptoms of mercury poisoning are identical to the symptoms of autism, it should be noted that most children who descend into the hellish state known as autism do so after the MMR vaccine. The MMR vaccine is one of the few vaccines that do not contain mercury. Thus, it is self-evident that the removal of mercury will not make vaccines "safe". (This is why the mercury is the only thing being addressed at all; because when the people reading this paper realize that the very mechanism by which vaccines corrupt the immune system means that NO vaccine is safe and effective; there will be an evolution of consciousness where the structure of lies telling us vaccines are safe and effective disintegrates.) In the autistic community, this will lead to an exodus from the multiple autism groups saying it is all about the mercury or worse yet, that autism genes are "inherited", to the only group which has their focus on the actual problem. This group is named TAAP (the Autism Autoimmunity Project at www.taap.info/ ), and is led by April Oakes. In this author's opinion, it will be TAAP in alliance with the vaccine damaged soldiers and vets of the American Gulf War Veterans Association at www.agwva.org led by Peter Kawaja which, working together, will stop this holocaust on humanity called VIDS. The good news is that these VIDS can be reversed using natural remedies contained in the Hippocrates Protocol ( www.drcarley.com ). This "surgical strike" detoxification approach which has the potential to reverse ALL of the aforementioned conditions under the VIDS umbrella as long as detoxification is started early enough (before age 10 for neurological VIDS) will be the one truth put on top of the mountain of lies (that vaccines are safe and effective) that will cause the entire mountain of vaccine lies to crumble. Combined with a massive outpouring of public support to these two organizations, the root of the tree of vaccine evil will be exposed. Thus, the holocaust on humanity (where instead of people being put in concentration camps, the concentration camps are being put into the people) will finally be put to an end.

Unfortunately, we can no longer pretend that this epidemic of VIDS is merely a "mistake" made by good intentioned, albeit misguided mad scientists. Because it's even worse than the above, folkswe are talking TREASON and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, PETS, and even PLANTS, (which are also being genetically modified to create vaccines). The evidence for this is as follows:

As concern for population growth started to grow and the final plans to bring in the New World Order were put in place, this lie called vaccines was transformed into pure evil, as it was realized that such delivery systems could be used to intentionally cause disease, which is now being done under the US Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, § 1520 and 1524. You can read it for yourself at your local library, or go to


This law has been in place since the 1960's, and it was last modified in April of 2000. The only stipulation made for experimentation on human subjects is that local civilian officials be notified 30 days before the experiment is started. Section 1524 adds that the Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide support for vaccination programs through use of excess peacetime biological weapons (i.e., weapons of mass destruction). In April 2000, § 1520 (a) was passed to put alleged restrictions on the use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents after a caller on C Span mentioned this law in 1999, which revealed this treasonous law to a huge audience of listeners (including this author, who has been including it in lectures and written materials since that call came into "Washington Journal"). However, the exceptions written to Title 50, chapter 32 under § 1520 subsection (b) in the 2000 law passed by our aiders and abettors of treason in Congress not only loophole back in a test carried out for "any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity"; but add that such biological and chemical warfare agents can now be also used for any law enforcement purpose, including "any purpose related to riot control" (just in case those C Span listeners should actually get off the couch at the horror of what the traitors in Washington, D.C. are doing to God's people). Subsection (c) of this law now mandates that "informed consent" be required. In reality, not a single vaccine has ever been tested for its long term side effects (including carcinogenic potential). Additionally, the intentional introduction of stealth viruses, (including man-made viruses that cause cancer, mycoplasma and the HIV virus), antigens which target certain races, (and surely a microchip in the future) into vaccines makes it self evident that informed consent is impossible, as it would initiate impeachment proceedings and war crimes trials against every "public servant" involved in perpetrating these crimes against the American people, in violation of the Nuremberg Code (which was written after the end of WW II to prevent the barbaric experiments that occurred in the Nazi concentration camps) .

What most people don't know is that the top level mad scientists from Nazi Germany were actually brought to the United States through "Operation Paperclip", and have been continuing their work to this day in places like Brookhaven labs, Cold Spring Harbor and Plum Island in this author's backyard on Long Island . (To see the document proving that American scientists created the HIV virus, this author refers you to p. 442 of Death in the Air by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, where you can read the 1969 document in which the U.S. military/CIA and Rockefeller directed National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC) announced that a research program to explore the feasibility of "creating a new infective microorganism which would be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease" could be completed at a total cost of $10 million.) Yes, this is what your tax dollars are going towards, folks. But hang on to your hat, because it only gets worse.

The most heinous, bone chilling and evil piece of this puzzle has been revealed to the world by an American hero named Peter Kawaja, who worked in the late 1980's as a security and counter terrorism expert for the United States government (a service for which he has been rewarded with the murder of his wife, torching of his home, issuance of a war crimes subpoena to (they thought) confiscate all his evidence, illegal IRS liens on all subsequent income, and multiple attempts on his own life, all funded by YOUR tax dollars). Please go to www.agwva.org/mission.htm  and read some of the 34 counts that Mr. Kawaja brought against the domestic traitors to America (in both their individual and governmental capacities) in a federal lawsuit in which the perpetrators, again, used your tax dollars to hire themselves attorneys from the Department of "Justice" whose defense of their war criminal clients was that they are "immune, under color of law". (You can listen to Mr. Kawaja on one of his multiple internet radio shows, including "What's Ailing America?" which he co-hosts with this author at www.highway2health.net  every Wednesday at 10 PM, EST.

Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National Institute of Health reported in December, 2003 that "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used". However, the reverberating truth, "the shot heard round the world" which will lead to the evolution of consciousness necessary to stop the holocaust against humanity known as vaccinations, will be that not only are vaccinations not safe or effective, but that they are actually weapons of mass destruction being perpetrated upon humanity in the name of health, for the purpose of genocide and to bring in the New World Order. Part 2 of the genocidal plan could drop anytime with activation of the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act whenever the next fabricated terrorist attack using biological agents occurs. Worse yet, the Congressional traitors in Washington posing as public "servants" are doing all they can to pass "Codex" legislation which will make the natural remedies and supplements used in the Hippocrates Protocol developed by this author to reverse all dis-eases only available by prescription. So, you didn't hear about that on your local news station either? Please go to the site of another American hero, John Hamill of the International Alliance for Health Freedom (who reversed his schizophrenia symptoms with these natural supplements and has dedicated his life to stop Codex from passing) at www.iahf.com.

Wake up, America-it's getting very late. It is time for the mountain of lies to crumble.
Please spread the word to everyone you know . . . we can make it happen.
The time to stop chopping at branches and get to the root of this evil is now!

Source: http://www.rense.com/general62/inno.htm

 • Home Contact Us What's New New Litters Puppy ExportsAbout Us Pom Reader Kennel Visit Poms in Canada Kennel Visit  • About Poms Stud Services Links Photo Album • 

   • Fun Photos New Damascusroad ChampionshipsPuppies Growing Up List of ArticlesAbout Pet FoodSkin/Coat Care Vaccination InformationCKC Breed Standard •